Yan Wentao

Keywords： Ecological Practice; Connotation and Characteristics; Logical Rules; Ecological Practice Knowledge System; Ecological Practice Framework

Abstract：

Taking ecological practice as the research object, we can better understand the basic rules of ecological practice and guide the direction to achieve a successful ecological practice. From the ontological perspective of ecological practice, this paper defines the concept and connotation of ecological practice, and puts forward six characteristics of ecological practice, such as organic system, territoriality, social diversity, spatial matching, temporality and covariance. Furthermore, five logical rules for ecological practice are summarized: indivisibility, context dependence, faulttolerance, adaptation, and feedback, which can help us to identify and avoid mistakes in practice. According to the knowledge source, the ecological practical knowledge is divided into four categories: ecological scientific knowledge, local tacit knowledge, practical motivation knowledge and procedural knowledge.

Funds：

• [1] 吴良镛. 人居环境科学导论[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2001.

  [2] 颜文涛, 萧敬豪, 胡海, 等. 城市空间结构的环境绩效: 进展与思考[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2012(5): 50-59.

  [3] 颜文涛, 萧敬豪. 城乡规划法规与环境绩效——环境绩效视角下城乡规划法规体系的若干思考[J]. 城市规划, 2015(11): 39-47.

  [4] 颜文涛, 象伟宁, 袁琳. 探索传统人类聚居的生态智慧——以世界文化遗产区都江堰灌区为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 2017(4): 1-9.

  [5] XIANG W N. Ecophronesis: the ecological practical wisdom for and from ecological practice[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2016(155): 53-60.

  [6] 颜文涛, 王云才, 象伟宁. 城市雨洪管理实践需要生态实践智慧的引导[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(16): 4926-4928.

  [7] SCH?N D. The crisis of professional knowledge and the pursuit of an epistemology of practice[M]// RAVEN J, STEPHENSON J, eds. Competence in the learning society. Peter Lang Publishing, Inc, 2001: 185-207.

  [8] MARU?I? I. Some observations regarding the education of landscape architects for the 21st century[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2002(60): 95-103.

  [9] 陶火生. 论生态实践及其基本特征[J]. 广西社会科学, 2007(4): 40-44.

  [10] 颜文涛, 王正, 韩贵锋, 等. 低碳生态城规划指标及实施途径[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2011(3): 39-50.

  [11] 相江苏. 生态文明的实践逻辑[J]. 改革与开放, 2016(12): 38-40.

  [12] SILVA E A, HEALEY P, HARRIS N, et al. 论规划研究的技巧[J]. 国际城市规划, 2018(1):101-110.

  [13] CHURCHMAN C W. Wicked problems[J]. Management Science, 1967, 14(4):141-142.

  [14] XIANG W N. Working with wicked problems in socio-ecological systems: awareness, acceptance, and adaptation[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2013, 110(1): 1-4.

  [15] 王志芳. 生态实践智慧与可实践生态知识[J]. 国际城市规划, 2017(4): 16-21.

  [16] SCH?N D. The reflective practitioner[M]. New York: BasicBooks, 1983.

  [17] PICKETT S T A, KOLASA J, JONES C G. Ecological understanding: the nature of theory and the theory of nature[M]. London: Academic Press, 2007.

  [18] 象伟宁. 魅力的巴斯德范式vs. 盛行的玻尔范式——谁是生态系统服务研究中更具生态实践智慧的研究范式?[J]. 现代城市研究, 2018(7): 2-6.

  [19] COOK B R, SPRAY C J. Ecosystem services and integrated water resource management: different paths to the same end?[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 109: 93-100.

  [20] CARPENTER S R, BENNETT E M, PETERSON G D. Scenarios for ecosystem services: an overview[J]. Ecology and Society, 2006, 11(1): 29-42.

  [21] 颜文涛, 黄欣, 邹锦. 融合生态系统服务的城乡土地利用规划: 概念框架与实施途径[J]. 风景园林, 2017(1): 45-51.

  [22] WORSTER D. Nature’s economy: a history of ecological ideas[M]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

  [23] NAESS A. The shallow and the deep long-range ecology movement: a summary[J]. Inquiry, 1973(16): 95-100.

  [24] 奥尔多·利奥波德. 沙乡年鉴[M]. 侯文惠, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2015.

  [25] 梭罗. 瓦尔登湖[M]. 王家湘, 译. 北京: 北京出版社出版集团, 2007.

  [26] OSTER G. Predicting populations[J]. American Zoologist, 1981(21): 831-844.

  [27] LEVINS R. The strategy of model building in population biology[J]. America Scientist, 1966(54): 421-431.

  [28] LAVE J, WENGER E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

  [29] 叶林, 邢忠, 颜文涛, 等. 趋近正义的城市绿色空间规划途径探讨[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2018(3): 57-64.

  [30] 颜文涛, 卢江林. 乡村社区复兴的两种模式：韧性视角下的启示与思考[J]. 国际城市规划, 2017(4): 22-28.