[1] WEICK K E. That’s moving: theories that matter[J]. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1999, 8(2): 134-142.
[2] MCKELVEY B. Response: Van de Ven and Johnson’s “engaged scholarship”: nice try, but …[J]. Academy of Management Review. 2006, 31(4): 822-829.
[3] DE NEUFVILLE J I. Planning theory and practice: bridging the gap[J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1983, 3: 35-45.
[4] XIANG W N. Socio-Ecological Practice Research (SEPR): what does the journal have to offer? [J]. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 2018,(1):1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-018-0001-y.
[5] WILSON E O. Consilience: the unity of knowledge[M]. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1998.
[6] WASSERMAN I C, KRAM K E. Enacting the scholar-practitioner role: an exploration of narratives[J]. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 2009, 45(1): 12-38.
[7] XIANG W N. Pasteur’s quadrant: an appealing ecophronetic alternative to the prevalent Bohr’s quadrant in ecosystem services research[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2017, 32(12): 2241-2247.
[8] INNES J E, BOOHER D E. Planning with complexity: an introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy[M]. 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge, 2018.
[9] STEINER F. Healing the earth: the relevance of Ian McHarg’s work for the future[J]. Philosophy & Geography, 2004, 7(1): 141-149.
[10] NAESS A. From ecology to ecosophy, from science to wisdom[J]. World Futures, 1989, 27(2):185-190.
[11] TALEB N N. Antifragile: things that gain from disorder[M]. New York: Random House, 2012.
[12] XIANG W N. Ecological practice: original flaw, wickedness, and the beacon of ecological wisdom[M] // ACHAL V, MUKHERJEE A, eds. Ecological wisdom inspired restoration engineering. Singapore: Springer, 2018: 269-273.
[13] Laozi. Tao te ching on the art of harmony[M]. Translated by HANSEN C. New York: Metro Books, 2009.
[14] DUBOS R J. Humanizing the Earth[J]. Science, 1973, 179(4075): 769-772.
[15] 王蒙. 庄子的享受[M]. 合肥: 安徽教育出版社, 2010: 325.
[16] XIANG W N. Working with wicked problems in socio-ecological systems: awareness, acceptance, and adaptation[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2013, 110 (1): 1-4.
[17] XIANG W N. Ecophronesis: the ecological practical wisdom for and from ecological practice[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2016, 155: 53-60.
[18] CHURCHMAN C W. Wicked problems[J]. Management Science, 1967,14(4): B141–B142.
[19] RITTEL H W J, WEBBER M M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning[J]. Policy Sciences, 1973, 4: 155-169.
[20] COYNE R. Wicked problems revisited[J]. Design Studies, 2005, 26(1):5-17.
[21] MAO T-T. On practice: on the relation between knowledge and practice, between knowing and doing[M] // Selected works of Mao Tse-Tung. Beijing: Foreign Language Press, 1967: 295-309.
[22] MELLES G. New pragmatism and the vocabulary and metaphors of scholarly design research[J]. Design Issues, 2008, 24(4): 88-101.
[23] VAN DE VEN A H. Engaged scholarship: a guide for organizational and social research[M]. Oxford: The Oxford University Press, 2007.
[24] INNES J E, BOOHER D E. Collaborative rationality as a strategy for working with wicked problems[J]. Landscape and urban planning, 2016, 154: 8-11.
[25] XIANG W N. Doing real and permanent good in landscape and urban planning: ecological wisdom for urban sustainability[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014 (121): 65-69.
[26] THORNTON P H, OCASIO W. Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1999, 105(3): 801-843.
[27] BOURDIEU P. The logic of practice[M]. California: Stanford University Press, 1990.
[28] PFEFFER J. A modest proposal: how we might change the process and product of managerial research[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(6): 1334-1345.
[29] COLLINS C J. Good to great: why some companies make the lead … and others don’t[M]. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2001.
[30] MCHARG I L. A quest for life: an autobiography[M]. New York: Wiley, 1996: 256-264.
[31] YANG B. Landscape performance: Ian McHarg’s ecological planning in the Woodlands, Texas[M]. London and New York: Routledge, 2018.
[32] 王宏民, 桑继录. 红旗渠志[M]. 北京: 三联书店, 1995.
[33] MCKELVEY B. Complexity leadership: the secret of Jack Welch’s success[J]. International Journal of Complexity in Leadership and Management, 2010,1(1): 4-36.
[34] Austin H. The virtue of ecophronesis: an ecological adaptation of practical wisdom[J]. The Heythrop Journal, 2018: 1009-1021.
[35] XIANG W N. Ecological wisdom: genesis, conceptualization, and defining characteristics[M] // YANG B, YOUNG RF eds. Ecological wisdom: theory and practice. Singapore: Springer, 2019: xiii-xxii.
[36] JIM C Y. Resolving intractable soil constraints in urban forestry through research–practice synergy[J]. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 2019: 1-13.
[37] STEINER F. Toward an ecological aesthetic[J]. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 2019,1(1): 33-37.
[38] WANG X H. Ecological wisdom as a guide for implementing the precautionary principle[J]. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 2019,1(1): 25-32.
[39] ANDRIANI P, MCKELVEY B. From gaussian to paretian thinking: causes and implications of power laws in organizations[J]. Organization Science, 2009, 20(6): 1053-1071.
[40] FORESTER J. The deliberative practitioner: encouraging participatory planning processes[M]. Mit Press, 1999.
[41] ACHAL V, MUKHERJEE A, eds. Ecological wisdom inspired restoration engineering[M]. Singapore: Springer, 2018.
[42] COOKE S J. From frustration to fruition in applied conservation research and practice: ten revelations[J]. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 2018: 1-9.
[43] HASELSBERGER H. Encounters in planning thought: 16 autobiographical essays from key thinkers in spatial planning[M]. New York and London: Routledge, 2017.
[44] JIM C Y. Highrise greenery: ancient invention with new lease of life[M] //TAN P Y, JIM C Y, eds. Greening cities: forms and functions. Singapore: Springer Nature, 2017: 227-249.
[45] JIM C Y. Resolving intractable soil constraints in urban forestry through research–practice synergy[J]. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 2019, 1(1): 41-53.
[46] LIAO K H, LE T A, VAN NGUYEN K. Urban design principles for flood resilience: learning from the ecological wisdom of living with floods in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2016, 155: 69-78.
[47] ZHANG L, YANG Z, VOINOV A, et al. Nature-inspired stormwater management practice: the ecological wisdom underlying the Tuanchen drainage system in Beijing, China and its contemporary relevance[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2016, 155: 11-20.
[48] FLYVBJERG B. Making social science matter: why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again[M]. Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[49] FLYVBJERG B, LANDMAN T, SCHRAM S, et al. Introduction: new directions in social science[M]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2012:1-14.
[50] SCHRAM S. Phronetic social science: an idea whose time has come[J]. Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis, 2012: 15-26.
[51] AITKEN S C, VALENTINE G. Approaches to human geography: philosophies, theories, people and practices[M]. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage, 2015.
[52] SCHWARTZ B, SHARPE K. Practical wisdom: the right way to do the right thing[M]. New York: Riverhead Books, 2010.
[53] TABACHNICK D E. The great reversal: how we let technology take control of the planet[M]. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2013.
[54] INNES J E, BOOHER D E. A turning point for planning theory? overcoming dividing discourses[J]. Planning Theory, 2015, 14(2): 195-213.
[55] FORESTER J. Ecological wisdom through deliberative improvisation: theory and practice in challenging cases[J]. Journal of Urban Management, 2019, 8(1): 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2018.04.003.
[56] INNES J E. Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: communicative action and interactive practice[J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1995, 14(3): 183-189.
[57] INNES J E. From informing policy to collaborating rationally[J]. Encounters in Planning Thought, 2017, 16: 145-163.
[58] SCH?N D A. The crisis of professional knowledge and the pursuit of an epistemology of practice[J]. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 1992, 6(1): 49-63.
[59] BRYANT A. Grounded theory and grounded theorizing: pragmatism in research practice[M]. Oxford: The Oxford University Press, 2017.
[60] SANDBERG J, TSOUKAS H. Grasping the logic of practice: theorizing through practical rationality[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2011, 36(2): 338-360.
[61] YIN R. Case study research: design and methods (applied social research methods) [M]. 5th ed. Los Angeles: Sage, 2014.
[62] MOORE S A. Pragmatic sustainability: theoretical and practical tools[M]. Routledge, London, 2010: 1-12.
[63] BUCHANAN R . Wicked problems in design thinking[J]. Design Issues, 1992, 8(2): 5-21.
[64] KIDD I J. What’s so great about Feyerabend? against method, forty years on[J]. Metascience, 2015, 24(3): 1-7.
[65] PALMER M A. Socioenvironmental sustainability and actionable science[J]. BioScience, 2012, 62(1): 5-6.
[66] MEYER M. The rise of the knowledge broker[J]. Science communication, 2010, 32(1): 118-127.
[67] WARD V, HOUSE A, HAMER S. Knowledge brokering: the missing link in the evidence to action chain?[J]. Evidence & Policy, 2009, 5(3): 267-279.
[68] WU J. Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human wellbeing in changing landscapes[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2013, 28(6): 999-1023.
[69] BATTY M. Planning support systems: progress, predictions, and speculations on the shape of things to come[M] // BRAIL RK, ed. Planning support systems for cities and regions. Massachusetts: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2008: 3-30.
[70] BRAIL R K, ed. Planning support systems for cities and regions[M]. Massachusetts: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2008.
[71] KLOSTERMAN R E, PETTIT C J. An update on planning support systems[J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2005: 32(4): 477-484.
[72] ENQUIST C A F, JACKSON S T, GARFIN G M, et al. Foundations of translational ecology[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2017, 15(10): 541-550.
[73] SCHLESINGER W H. Translational ecology[J]. Science, 2010,(327): 148.
[74] WALL T U, MCNIE E, GARFIN G M. Use-inspired science: making science usable by and useful to decision makers[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2017, 15(10): 551-559.
[75] DEWEY J. The public and its problems[M]. Denver: Alan Swallo, 1927.
[76] ACKOFF R L. From data to wisdom: presidential address to ISGSR[J]. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 1989, 16: 3-9.
[77] JOHNSON P. The birth of the modern world society 1815-1830[M]. New York: Harper Perennial, 1992.
[78] WILSON E O. Biophilia[M]. Massachusetts: The Harvard University Press, 1984.
[79] STOKES D E. Pasteur’s quadrant: basic science and technological innovation[M]. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1997.
[80] KIESER A, LEINER L. Why the rigour–relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2009, 46(3): 516-533.
[81] PARSONS T. The social systems[M]. Illinois: Free Press, 1951.
[82] KLOSTERMAN R E. Planning theory education: a thirty-year review[J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2011, 31(3): 319-331.