点击排行
 
正文
全文下载次数:287
2022年第2期   DOI:10.19830/j.upi.2020.408
社区建成环境审计——推进健康社区的有效工具
Community Built Environment Auditing: An Effective Approach to Healthy Community

牟燕川 王荻 黄瓴

Mou Yanchuan, Wang Di, Huang Ling

关键词:健康社区;建成环境评价;审计工具;微观尺度;系统性观察

Keywords:Healthy Community; Built Environment Assessment; Audit Tool; Micro-scale; Systematic Observation

摘要:

社区建成环境是承载且引导居民健康行为的空间载体。推进健康社区建设的关键问题之一是了解该社区的特征和资源,以及正确认识社区建成环境如何影响个体健康。掌握科学的社区建成环境评价方法对于探索在地性的社区健康提升策略具有重要现实意义。近年来,社区建成环境审计方法常用于公共卫生领域的研究,关注微观尺度环境(如人行道、坐凳空间)的特征和质量,可以支撑更精细尺度的环境现状评估、问题研判和场景模拟分析。本文通过相关理论和实证文献的研究,解读社区建成环境审计工具的特征,识别其价值与核心,同时梳理国际上广泛应用的社区建成环境审计工具的关键信息,在此基础上构建一套适合中国城市特征、以健康为导向的社区建成环境审计工具,以期为推进健康社区建设提供方法支撑。

Abstract:

The community built environment is the physical space to guide residents’ health behaviors. One of the key issues to promote the construction of healthy community is to understand the characteristics and resources of the community, and how the community built environment influences individual health. As a result, it is of great practical significance to develop reasonable method to assess features of built environment considered relevant to promote local community health. In recent years, the community built environment audit tools are often used in the research of public health field, focusing on the characteristics and quality of micro-scale built environment (e.g. sidewalks, outdoor benches). Moreover, the adoption of the tools can support more detailed environmental condition assessment, problem analysis and scenescape simulation. Through the relevant theoretical and empirical literature researches, this study interprets the connotation of community built environment audit tool, identifies its core value and essentials, and summarizes key characteristics of 15 audit tools widely used in the world. On this basis, a set of audit tool which is suitable for Chinese context and health-oriented community built environment is constructed to provide methodological support for promoting healthy community construction.

版权信息:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(52008049),国家自然科学基金(51778078),中国博士后科学基金(2019M663438)
作者简介:

牟燕川,博士,重庆大学建筑城规学院,山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室,助理研究员。yanchuan@cqu.edu.cn

王荻,硕士,成都轨道建设工程保障中心,技术员。snailwd@foxmail.com

黄瓴(通信作者),博士,重庆大学建筑城规学院,山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室,教授,博士生导师。hwawa1025@vip.163.com


译者简介:

参考文献:
  • [1] GILES-CORTI B, VERNEZ-MOUDON A, REIS R, et al. City planning and population health: a global challenge[J]. The lancet, 2016, 388(10062): 2912-2924.

    [2] 王一. 健康城市导向下的社区规划[J]. 规划师, 2015, 31(10): 101-105.

    [3] 王宏, 崔东旭. 基于健康需求特征的济南居住社区建成环境研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2020, 27(3): 77-82.

    [4] 王兰, 廖舒文, 赵晓菁. 健康城市规划路径与要素辨析[J]. 国际城市规划, 2016, 31(4): 4-9.

    [5] 于一凡, 胡玉婷. 社区建成环境健康影响的国际研究进展——基于体力活动研究视角的文献综述和思考[J]. 建筑学报, 2017(2): 33-38.

    [6] ECHEVERRíA S, DIEZ-ROUX A V, SHEA S, et al. Associations of neighborhood problems and neighborhood social cohesion with mental health and health behaviors: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis[J]. Health & place, 2008, 14(4): 853-865.

    [7] 黄瓴. 从“需求为本”到“资产为本”——当代美国社区发展研究的启示[J]. 室内设计, 2012, 27(5): 3-7.

    [8] 龙瀛. 颠覆性技术驱动下的未来人居——来自新城市科学和未来城市等视角[J]. 建筑学报, 2020( 增刊1): 34-40.

    [9] BROWNSON R C, HOEHNER C M, DAY K, et al. Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science[J]. American journal of preventive medicine, 2009, 36(4 supplement): 99-123.

    [10] 曹新宇. 社区建成环境和交通行为研究回顾与展望:以美国为鉴[J]. 国际城市规划, 2015, 30(4): 46-52.

    [11] CERVERO R, KOCKELMAN K. Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design[J]. Transportation research part d: transport and environment, 1997, 2(3): 199-219.

    [12] EWING R, CERVERO R. Travel and the built environment[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2010, 76(3): 265-294.

    [13] 姜洋, 王悦, 解建华, 等. 回归以人为本的街道:世界城市街道设计导则最新发展动态及对中国城市的启示[J]. 国际城市规划, 2012, 27(5): 65-72.

    [14] 熊文, 马瑞, 姜腾, 等. 北京云景东路街道空间人本评价研究[C] // 活力城乡·美好人居——2019 中国城市规划年会论文集. 重庆, 2019: 14.

    [15] BURTON E J, MITCHELL L, STRIDE C B. Good places for ageing in place: development of objective built environment measures for investigating links with older people’ s wellbeing[J]. BMC public health, 2011, 11(1): 839.

    [16] MEHTA V. Look closely and you will see, listen carefully and you will hear: urban design and social interaction on streets[J]. Journal of urban design, 2009, 14(1): 29-64.

    [17] MILLSTEIN R A, CAIN K L, SALLIS J F, et al. Development, scoring, and reliability of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS)[J]. BMC public health, 2013, 13(1): 403.

    [18] CAROL P. Community auditing as community development[J]. Community development journal, 1998(3): 249-259.

    [19] CUNNINGHAM G O, MICHAEL Y L, FARQUHAR S A, et al. Developing a reliable senior walking environmental assessment tool[J]. American journal of preventive medicine, 2005, 29(3): 215-217.

    [20] 威廉· H. 怀特. 小城市空间的社会生活[M]. 叶齐茂, 倪晓晖, 译. 上海译文出版社, 2016.

    [21] OTTONI C A, SIMS-GOULD J, WINTERS M, et al. “Benches become like porches”: built and social environment influences on older adults’experiences of mobility and well-being[J]. Social science & medicine, 2016, 169: 33-41.

    [22] 鲁斐栋, 谭少华. 建成环境对体力活动的影响研究:进展与思考[J]. 国际城市规划, 2015, 30(2): 62-70.

    [23] ZHU W, SUN Y, KURKA J, et al. Reliability between online raters with varying familiarities of a region: Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes(MAPS)[J]. Landscape and urban planning, 2017, 167: 240-248.

    [24] MASTROFSKI S D, PARKS R B, MCCLUSKEY J D. Systematic social observation in criminology[M] // PIQUERO A R, WEISBURD D, eds. Handbook of quantitative criminology. New York: Springer, 2010: 225-247.

    [25] CAUGHY M O, CAMPO P J O, PATTERSON J. A brief observational measure for urban neighborhoods[J]. Health & place, 2001, 7(3): 225-236.

    [26] PIKORA T, GILES-CORTI B, BULL F, et al. Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling[J]. Social science & medicine, 2003, 56(8): 1693-1703.

    [27] EMERY J, CRUMP C, BORS P. Reliability and validity of two instruments designed to assess the walking and bicycling suitability of sidewalks and roads[J]. American journal of health promotion, 2003, 18(1): 38-46.

    [28] BROWNSON R C, HOEHNER C M, BRENNAN L K, et al. Reliability of two instruments for auditing the environment for physical activity[J]. Journal of physical activity and health, 2004, 1(3): 191-208.

    [29] LEE R E, BOOTH K M, REESE-SMITH J Y, et al. The Physical Activity Resource Assessment (PARA) instrument: evaluating features, amenities and incivilities of physical activity resources in urban neighborhoods[J]. The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2005, 2: 13.

    [30] WILLIAMS J E, EVANS M, KIRTLAND K A, et al. Development and use of a tool for assessing sidewalk maintenance as an environmental support of physical activity[J]. Health promotion practice, 2005, 6(1): 81-88.

    [31] BOARNET M G, DAY K, ALFONZO M, et al. The Irvine-Minnesota inventory to measure built environments: reliability tests[J]. American journal of preventive medicine, 2006, 30(2): 153-159.

    [32] ANDRESEN E M, MALMSTROM T K, WOLINSKY F D, et al. Rating neighborhoods for older adult health: results from the African American health study[J]. BMC public health, 2008, 8: 35.

    [33] HOEHNER C M, IVY A, BRENNAN RAMIREZ L K, et al. Active neighborhood checklist: a user-friendly and reliable tool for assessing activity friendliness[J]. American journal of health promotion, 2007, 21(6): 534-537.

    [34] SPIVOCK M, GAUVIN L, BRODEUR J M. Neighborhood-level active living buoys for individuals with physical disabilities[J]. American journal of preventive medicine, 2007, 32(3): 224-230.

    [35] MCGUIRT J T, JILCOTT S B, VU M B, et al. Conducting community audits to evaluate community resources for healthful lifestyle behaviors: an illustration from rural eastern north Carolina[J]. Preventing chronic disease, 2011, 8(6): A149.

    [36] SALLIS J F, CAIN K L, CONWAY T L, et al. Is your neighborhood designed to support physical activity? a brief streetscape audit tool[J]. Preventing chronic disease, 2015, 12: E141.

    [37] 李萌. 基于居民行为需求特征的“15分钟社区生活圈”规划对策研究[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2017(1): 111-118.

    [38] 丹尼尔·西尔, 特里·克拉克. 场景:空间品质如何塑造社会生活[M]. 祁述裕, 吴军, 译. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2019.


《国际城市规划》编辑部    北京市车公庄西路10号东楼E305/320    100037
邮箱:upi@vip.163.com  电话:010-58323806  传真:010-58323825
京ICP备13011701号-6  京公网安备11010802014223

7725500