[1] BELAND D. The idea of power and the role of ideas[J]. Political studies review, 2010, 8(2): 145-154.
[2] BLOMLEY N. Landscapes of property[J]. Law & society review, 1998, 32(3): 567-612.
[3] BOAS T C. Conceptualizing continuity and change: the composite-standard model of path dependence[J]. Journal of theoretical politics, 2007, 19(1): 33-54.
[4] BOOTH P. Controlling development: certainty, discretion in Europe, the USA and Hong Kong[M]. London: UCL Press, 1996.
[5] BUITELAAR E, LAGENDIJK A, JACOBS W. A theory of institutional change: illustrated by Dutch city-provinces and Dutch land policy[J]. Environment and planning a, 2007, 39: 891-908.
[6] CAMPBELL J L. Institutional reproduction and change[M] // MORGAN G, CAMPBELL C C, PEDERSEN K, et al, eds. The Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[7] CAPOCCIA G, KELEMEN R D. The study of critical junctures: theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism[J]. World politics, 2007, 59(3): 341-369.
[8] DUNN J A. Driving forces: the automobile, its enemies, and the politics of mobility[M]. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1998.
[9] FRIEDMANN J. Becoming urban: periurban dynamics in Vietnam and China introduction[J]. Pacific affairs, 2011, 84(3): 425-434.
[10] GEELS F W. Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective[J]. Theory, culture & society, 2014, 21(5): 21-40.
[11] GOLDEWIJK K K, BEUSEN A, JANSSEN P. Long-term dynamic modeling of global population and built-up area in a spatially explicit way: HYDE 3.1[J]. Holocene, 2010, 20(4): 565-573.
[12] GRZYMALA-BUSSE A. Time will tell? temporality and the analysis of causal mechanisms and processes[J]. Comparative political studies, 2011, 44(9): 1267-1297.
[13] HACKER J S, PIERSON P, THELEN K. Drift and conversion: hidden faces of institutional change[M] // MAHONEY J, THELEN K, eds. Advances in comparative historical analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015: 180-208.
[14] HALL P A. Cities of tomorrow[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988.
[15] HALL P A, SOSKICE D W. Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
[16] HALL P A, TAYLOR R C R. Political science and the three new institutionalisms[J]. Political studies, 1996, 44(5): 936-957.
[17] HAY C. Constructivist institutionalism[M] // RHODES R A W, BINDER A, ROCKMAN B A, eds. The Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006: 56-75.
[18] HOMMELS A. Unbuilding cities: obduracy in urban socio-technical change Cambridge[M]. Mass.: MIT Press, 2005.
[19] HUGHES T P. Technological momentum[M] // SMITH M R, MARX L, eds. Does technology drive histor y? the dilemma of technological determinism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994: 101-113.
[20] KATZNELSON I. Periodization and preferences: reflections on purposive action in comparative historical social science[M] // MAHONEY J, RUESCHEMEYER D, eds. Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 270-301.
[21] KEIL R. Governance restructuring in Los Angeles and Toronto: amalgamation or secession?[J]. International journal of urban and regional research, 2000, 24(4): 758-781.
[22] LOWNDES V, ROBERTS M. Why institutions matter: the new institutionalism in political science[M]. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
[23] MAHONEY J. Path dependence in historical sociology[J]. Theory and society, 2000, 29: 507-548.
[24] MAHONEY J, RUESCHEMEYER D. Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[25] MAHONEY I, THELEN K, eds. Advances in comparative-historical analysis[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
[26] MAHONEY I, THELEN K. Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power[M]. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
[27] MARCOTULLIO P J. Variations of urban environmental transitions: the experiences of rapidly developing Asia Pacific cities[M] // MARCOTULLIO P J, MCGRANAHAN G, eds. Scaling urban environmental challenges: from local to global and back. London: Earthscan, 2007: 45-68.
[28] MELOSI M V. The sanitary city: urban infrastructure in America from colonial times to the present[M]. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.
[29] NORTH D C. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance[M]. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[30] OSTROM E. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[31] PIERSON P. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics[J]. American political science review, 2000, 94(2): 251-267.
[32] PIERSON P. Politics in time: history, institutions, and social analysis[M]. NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.
[33] PIERSON P. Power and path dependence[M] // MAHONEY J, THELEN K, eds. Advances in comparative-historical analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015: 123-146.
[34] PRED A. Place as historically contingent process: structuration and the timegeography of becoming places[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1984, 74(2): 279-297.
[35] SORENSEN A. The making of urban Japan: cities and planning from edo to the 21st century[M]. London: Routledge, 2002.
[36] SORENSEN A. Evolving property rights in Japan: patterns and logics of change[J]. Urban studies, 2011, 48(3): 471-491.
[37] SORENSEN A. Taking path dependence seriously: an historical institutionalist research agenda in planning history[J]. Planning perspectives, 2015: 30(1), 17-38.
[38] SORENSEN A. Periurbanization as the institutionalization of place: the case of Japan[J]. Cities, 2016, 53: 134-140.
[39] SORENSEN A. New intuitionalism and planning theory[M] // GUNDER M, MADANIPOUR A, WATSON V, eds. Rutledge handbook of planning theory. London, New York: Routledge, 2017: 250-263.
[40] SORENSEN A. Global suburbanization in panning history[M] // HEIN C, ed. Routledge handbook of planning history. London; New York: Routledge, 2018a.
[41] SORENSEN A. Institutions in urban space: land, infrastructure and governance in the production of urban property[J]. Planning theory and practice, 2018b, 19(1): 21-38.
[42] SORENSEN A, HESS P M. Building suburbs, Toronto style: land development, institutions, critical junctures, and continuity[J]. Town planning review, 2015, 86(4): 411-436.
[43] STREECK W. Epilogue comparative-historical analysis: past, present, future[M] // MAHONEY J, THELEN K, eds. Advances in comparative historical analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015: 264-288.
[44] SUTCLIFFE A. Towards the planned city: Germany, Britain, the United States and France, 1780-1914[M]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1981.
[45] TARR J A, KONVITZ J W. Patterns in the development of urban infrastructure[M] // GILLTTE H, MILLER Z L, eds. American urbanism: a historiographical review. New York: Greenwood Press, 1987: 195-226.
[46] THORNLEY A. Urban planning under Thatcherism: the challenge of the market[M]. London: Routledge, 1991.
[47] TSEBELIS G. Veto players and institutional analysis[J]. Governance: an international journal of policy and administration, 2000, 13(4): 441-474.
[48] UNDESA. World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision[M]. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2014.
[49] UNRUH G C. Understanding carbon lock-in[J]. Energy policy, 2000, 28(12): 817-830.
[50] URRY J. The ‘system’ of automobility. theory[J]. Theory, culture and society, 2004, 21(4/5): 25-39.
[51] WAN G, ZHANG Y. Accelerating urbanization explained: the role of information[R]. ADBI Working Paper, 2017.
[52] WARD S V. Planning the twentieth-century city: the advanced capitalist world[M]. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley and Sons, 2002.
[53] WEBSTER D. An overdue agenda: systematizing East Asian peri-urban research[J]. Pacific affairs, 2011, 84(4): 631-642.