DOI: 10.22217/upi.2017.424
Theories and Practices of Urban River Restoration in the Perspective of Green Infrastructure: The Case of Seattle

Li Ya

Keywords: River Restoration; Green Infrastructure; Urban Watershed; Ecosystem; Social Benefits

Abstract:

Urbanization leads to canalization and ecosystem degradation of urban rivers. Ecological restoration would reestablish urban river dynamics, thus improve river ecosystem function and urban watershed health. This paper summarizes the definition and methods of urban river restoration. Through case study of several restoration projects in Seattle, it explores the integration of the restoration design with urban functions and stormwater management and assessed their outcomes and values. Some findings are highlighted. River restorations promote urban watershed connectivity and work as potential links and nodes of the green infrastructure network. The small cumulative restorations under urban constraints provide opportunities for urban sustainable development and community revitalization. Stakeholder’s participation and collaboration are key to the advance of restoration. Assessing restoration should consider multiple objectives and values. These lessons are valuable to the current ecological restoration and urban enhancement projects in China, promoting sustainable urban transformation.

Funds:

Brief Info of Author(s):

References:
  • [1] PAUL M J, MEYER J L. Streams in the urban landscape[J]. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2003, 32(1): 207-231.
    [2] V?R?SMARTY C J, MCINTYRE P B, GESSNER M O, et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity[J]. Nature, 2010, 467(7315): 555-561.
    [3] WALSH C J, ROY A H, FEMINELLA J W, et al. The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure[J]. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2005, 24(3): 706-723.
    [4] SABBION P. Urban river restoration[M] // PERINI K, SABBION P. Urban sustainability and river restoration: green and blue infrastructure. Wiley Blackwell, 2016: 76-92.
    [5] SABBION P. Green and blue infrastructure in cities[M] // PERINI K, SABBION P. Urban sustainability and river restoration: green and blue infrastructure. Wiley Blackwell, 2016: 1-9.
    [6] BENEDICT MA, MCMAHON E T. Green infrastructure: smart conservation for the 21st century[J]. Renewable Resources Journal, 2002, 20(3): 12-17.
    [7] The Nature Conservancy. China’s Urban Water Blueprint[R]. Beijing: The Nature Conseruancy,2016.
    [8] SHOREDITS A S, CLAYTON J A. Assessing the practice and challenges of stream restoration in urbanized environments of the USA[J]. Geography Compass, 2013, 7(5): 358-372.
    [9] CLEWELL A, ARONSON J, WINTERHALDER K. The SER international primer on ecological restoration[J]. Ecological Restoration, 2004, 2: 206-207.
    [10] CLEWELL A F, ARONSON J. The SER primer and climate change[J]. Ecological Management and Restoration, 2013, 14(3): 182-186.
    [11] National Research Council. Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: science, technology, and public policy[M]. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 1992.
    [12] PALMER M A, HONDULA K L, KOCH B J, et al. Ecological restoration of streams and rivers: shifting strategies and shifting goals[J]. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2014, 45(1): 247-269.
    [13] COCKERILL K, ANDERSON W P. Creating false images: stream restoration in an urban setting[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2014, 50(2): 468-482.
    [14] PALMER M A, FILOSO S, FANELLI R M, et al. From ecosystems to ecosystem services: stream restoration as ecological engineering[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2014, 65(4): 62-70.
    [15] KONDOLF G M, YANG CN. Planning river restoration projects: social and cultural dimensions[M] // DARBY S E, SEAR D A. River restoration: managing the uncertainty in restoring physical habitat. Wiley, 2008: 43-60.
    [16] SIMENSTAD C A, TANNER C D, CRANDELL C, et al. Challenges of habitat restoration in a heavily urbanized estuary: evaluating the investment[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2005, 21(3): 6-23.
    [17] EVERARD M, MOGGRIDGE H L. Rediscovering the value of urban rivers[J]. Urban Ecosystems, 2012, 15(2): 293-314.
    [18] EDEN S, TUNSTALL S M, TAPSELl S M, et al. Translating nature: river restoration as nature - culture[J]. Environment and Planning D-society & Space, 2000, 18(2): 257-273.
    [19] PALMER M A, BERNHARDT E S, ALLAN J D, et al. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 42(2): 208-217.
    [20] WALSH C J, FLETCHER T D, LADSON A R. Stream restoration in urban catchments through redesigning stormwater systems: looking to the catchment to save the stream[J]. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2005, 24(3): 690-705.
    [21] MUSACCHIO L R. Urban ecology: science of cities[J]. Landscape Journal, 2015, 34(2): 193-194.
    [22] ROSGEN D L. Natural channel design: fundamental concepts, assumptions, and methods[J]. Stream Restoration in Dynamic Fluvial Systems, 2011, 194: 69-93.
    [23] Restore Our Waters[EB/OL]. [2017-06-25].
    http://www.seattle.gov/util/RestoreOurWaters/.
    [24] SPU Proposes Integrated Plan to Protect Seattle Waterways[EB/OL]. [2017-06-25] http://stormwater.wef.org/2015/06/spu-proposes-integrated-planprotect-seattle-waterways/.
    [25] Seattle Public Utilities. Protect Our Waters[EB/OL]. [2017-06-25]. http://www.seattle.gov/util/EnvironmentConservation/OurWatersheds/ProtectOurWaters/index.htm.
    [26] 700 Million Gallons[EB/OL]. [2017-06-25]. http://www.700milliongallons.org/.

    [27] King County. Our Duwamish[EB/OL]. [2017-06-27]. http://www.kingcounty.gov/services/environment/watersheds/green-river/OurDuwamish.aspx.
    [28] SIMENSTAD C A, TANNER C D, CRANDELL C, et al. Challenges of habitat restoration in a heavily urbanized estuary: evaluating the investment[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2005, 21(3): 6-23.
    [29] Seaport Planning Group. Lower Duwamish River Habitat Restoration Plan[R]. 2009.
    [30] YOCOM K. Building watershed narratives: an approach for broadening the scope of success in urban stream restoration[J]. Landscape Research, 2014, 39(6): 698-714.
    [31] O’NEILL K, GAYNOR P. Retrieving buried creeks in Seattle political and institutional barriers to urban daylighting projects[M] // FRANCE R L. Handbook of regenerative landscape design. CRC Press, 2008: 73-107.
    [32] GIRALDO G, LO M, DAVIES M, et al. Thornton creek water quality channel, urban water quality, and environmental benefits[M] // Low impact development: new and continuing applications. Reston Va American Society of Civil Engineers, 2009: 220-225.
    [33] GIRALDO G, DAVIES M, PREISLER S. Thornton creek water quality channel: from parking lot to channel headwaters[M] // Low impact development 2010: redefining water in the city. American Society of Civil Engineers, 2010: 1709-1720.
    [34] Thornton Creek Water Quality Channel: Methodology for landscape performance benefits[EB/OL]. [2017-06-30].
    https://lafoundation.org/myos/my-uploads/2010/09/03/svrtcwqcmethodology.pdf.
    [35] PINKHAM R. Daylighting: new life for buried streams[M]. Rocky Mountain Institute, 2000.
    [36] CORMIER N S. Growing Green Infrastructure Along the Urban River Duwamish Stories[M] // FRANCE R L. Handbook of regenerative landscape design. CRC Press, 2007.
    [37] 高晓琴, 姜姜, 张金池. 生态河道研究进展及发展趋势[J]. 南京林业大学学报( 自然科学版), 2008(1): 103-106.
    -seattle-waterways/..

TOP 10