Wang Ning

Keywords： Randstad; Rural Landscape; Open Space Protection; Leisure Function

Abstract：

Under the background of leisure economy and consumption in China, the ecological and economic value of rural areas around the big cities has drawn more and more attention. The discussion on the way of protection and construction of rural areas in suburban areas is also increasing. As a typical model of the open agglomeration, the construction strategy of the Randstad has a strong demonstration and reference significance for the contemporary village. This paper reviews the current features and construction strategies of the Randstad rural area, from the three aspects of landscape construction, protection method and functional organization. The author puts forward the following conclusions. First, after the agricultural modernization,  the Randstad farmland landscape gradually returned to traditional and simple construction. Second, although the Randstad agglomeration faced with different problems in different historical periods, the protection of regional structural green space has been maintained. Third, the Randstad rural leisure function has been constantly strengthened and improved, and it is supported by multi-layer space system and slow traffic network. The purpose of this paper is to explore international successful experience and provide useful reference for similar areas in China.

Funds：

• [1] MEYER Han, BOBBINK Inge, NIJHUIS Steffen, eds. Delta urbanism: the Netherlands[M]. America: APA Planners Press, 2010.
  [2] DOEVENDANS Kees, L?RZING Han, SCHRAM Anne. From modernist landscapes to new nature: planning of rural utopias in the Netherlands[J]. Landscape Research, 2007, 32(3): 333-354.
  [3] FAZAL Shahab, GEERTMAN Stan C M, TOPPEN Fred J. Interpretation of trends in land transformations-a case of Green Heart Region (the Netherlands)[J]. Natural Resources, 2012(3): 107-117.
  [4] PADT Franks J G, WESTERINK Judith. Addressing scale in open space preservation: learning from the Hague Region in the Netherlands[J]. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 2012, 103(5): 601-614.
  [5] 华晨. 兰斯塔德的城市发展和规划[J]. 城市规划汇刊, 1996(6): 16-25.
  [6] 王佐. 荷兰开放空间系统性规划思想及启示[J]. 规划师, 2008(11): 90-93.
  [7] RIJ Evelien Van, DEKKERS Jasper, KOOMEN Eric. Analysing the success of open space preservation in the Netherlands: the Midden-delfland Case[J]. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 2008, 99(1): 115-124.
  [8] WILBERS Joanna. Social organisations of urban and peri-urban producers. Management models and innovative alliances for policy influencing[M]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: ETC Foundation – Urban Agriculture Programme, 2005.
  [9] KOOMEN Eric, DEKKERS Jasper, DIJK Terry van. Open-space preservation in the Netherlands: planning, practice and prospects[J]. Land Use Policy, 2008(25): 361-377.
  [10] 王晓俊, 王建国. 兰斯塔德与“绿心”——荷兰西部城市群开放空间的保护与利用[J]. 规划师, 2006(3): 90-93.
  [11] 吴德刚, 朱玮, 王德. 荷兰兰斯塔德地区的规划历程及启示[J]. 现代城市研究, 2013(1): 39-46.
  [12] 吴之凌. 城市生态功能区规划与实施的国际经验及启示——以大伦敦地区和兰斯塔德地区为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 2015(1): 95-100.
  [13] 叶齐茂, 编著. 发达国家郊区建设案例与政策研究[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2009.