Xu Nannan

Keywords： The US Planning; Zoning;Planning Implementation; Planning Institution; Legislation

Abstract：

The two model laws in 1920s, A Standard State Zoning Enabling Act and A Standard City Planning Enabling Act, shaped the landscape of the US planning institution. Comparing with the Chinese planning laws, they provided more detailed procedural regulations,
enabled more participation of stakeholders and the general public, and designed more institutional tools for planning implementation. By conducting content analysis of the two model laws and comparing their institutional designs with the Chinese counterparts, this paper draws conclusions and policy recommendations for the Chinese planning reform.

Funds：

• [1] U.S. Department of Commerce-Advisory Committee on Zoning. A Standard State Zoning Enabling Act[R]. 1926.
  [2] U.S. Department of Commerce-Advisory Committee on City Planning And Zoning. A Standard City Planning Enabling Act[R]. 1928.
  [3] KNACK R, MECK S，STOLLMAN I. The real story behind the standard planning and zoning acts of the 1920s[J]. Land Use Law & Zoning Digest, 1996, 48(2): 3-9.
  [4] 全国人民代表大会. 中华人民共和国行政诉讼法[EB/OL]. (1989)[2017-08-20]. http://law.npc.gov.cn/FLFG/flfgByID.action?f lfgID=36698822&keyword= 行政诉讼法&zlsxid=01.
  [5] 全国人民代表大会常务委员会. 全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于修改《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》的决定[EB/OL]. (2014)[2017-08-20]. http://law.npc.gov.cn/FLFG/flfgByID.action?flfgID=34496520&keyword=《关于修改中华人民共和国行政诉讼法的决定》&zlsxid=11.