Tan Wenyong, Feng Yufei

Keywords： Urban Planning Education; Evolution; The UK; The USA

Abstract：

Through the collection and analysis of the development process of urban planning education in the UK and the USA during the past 100 years, the paper finds that the trend and the pattern of the evolution in the two nations are almost the same then further sums up the five stages and the cycle of transformation of the development of urban planning education in the UK and the USA. The enlightenment of the above-mentioned research findings upon the current urban planning education in China are: the connection between the discipline development and the planning body should be clarified; the theoretical research and the design practice should be balanced; the initiative of the Education Evaluation Committee should be exercised. It is hoped that the urban planning education in China can be improved.

Funds：

• [1] 赵万民. 城乡规划学科的建设与发展过程[J]. 室内设计, 2013(2): 1-4.
  [2] WATSON V. Inclusive urban planning for the working poor: planning education trends and potential shifts[R]. WIEGO Working Paper (Urban Policies) NO.21, 2011.
  [3] BRUNO G R. Changing paradigms of professional practice，education and research in academic ：a history of planning education in United States[D]. University of Pennsylvania, 1993.
  [4] DALTON L C. Weaving the fabric of planning as education[J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2001, 20: 423-436.
  [5] AIP: American Institute of Planners. Recommendations for an A.I.P. accrediting system[J]. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1950, 16(2): 97-99.
  [6] PERLOFF H S. Education for planning city state and regional[M]. The Johns Hopkins Press, 1957.
  [7] RAO M V. Paul Davidoff and planning education: a study of the origin of the urban planning program at Hunter College[J]. Journal of Planning History, 2012, 11(3): 226-241.
  [8] FRIEDMANN J. Knowledge and action: a guide to planning theory[J]. Journal of the American Institute of Planner, 1974(1): 02-16.
  [9] BEARD V A, BASOLO V. Commentary: moving beyond crisis, crossroads, and the abyss in the disciplinary formation of planning[J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2009, 29: 233-242.
  [10] KLOSTERMAN R E. Planning theory education: a thirty-year review[J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2011, 31: 319-331.
  [11] SAVICHI D. Planning education and planning practice: can we plan for the next decade? [J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1988(7): 115-120.
  [12] DAVOUDI S, PENDLEBURY J. The evolution of planning as an academic discipline[J]. Town Planning Review, 2010, 81(6): 613-645.
  [13] CHERRY G E. The evolution of british town planning[M]. Bedfordshire: Leonard Hill Books, 1974.
  [14] HEALEY P. Education for planning: a continuous process[C]. ISOCARP congress: expanding demands on planning. Prague, 1994.
  [15] MILLER D, WESTERLUND F. Specialized land use curricula in urban planning graduate programes[J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1990(9): 203-206.
  [16] HEUMANN L F, WETMORE L B. A partial history of planning workshops: the experience of ten schools from 1955 to 1984[J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1984(4): 120-130.
  [17] FRIEDMANN J. The core curriculum in planning revisited[J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1996, 15: 89-104.
  [18] 托马斯·库恩. 科学革命的结构[M]. 金吾伦, 胡新和, 译. 北京大学出版社, 2012.
  [19] Harris B. The emerging unity of science and humanism in planning[J]. Journal of the American planning Association, 1988, 54(4): 521-524.
  

  [20] GALLOWAY T, MAHAYNI R. Planning theory in retrospect: the process of paradigm change[J]. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 1977, 43(1): 62-71.
  [21] FRANK A I. Three decades of thought on planning education[J]. Journal of Planning Literature, 2006, 21: 15-67.
  [22] 吴志强. 吴志强教授谈中国城市规划教育的发展历程[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2007(3): 9-13.
  [23] 马武定. 城市规划本质的回归[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2005(1): 10-20.
  [24] 段进, 李志明. 城市规划的职业认同与学科发展的知识领域——对城市规划学科本体问题的再探讨[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2005(6): 59-63.
  [25] RAMPANT K J F. Schizophreniathe case of city and regional planning[J]. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1970, 36: 221-223.