DOI: 10.22217/upi.2017.087
Methodology and Application of Quantitative Case Study in Urban Planning & Design in the New Data Environment

Gan Xinyue, Long Ying

Keywords: Methodology; New Data Environment; Urban Design; Data Augmented Design

Abstract:

As one of the essential parts in urban planning and design practice, the methodology about case study which is more reasonable and effective has not been established yet. Therefore, this paper attempts to provide the quantitative research methodology aiming at case study, which is applicable to urban planning and design in both incremental and stock urban areas. This methodology will be based on the new data environment as well as the framework of Data Augmented Design. After that, as the empirical research, the urban design practice in the new town of Tong Zhou is used to verify the feasibility of methodology in incremental areas. The paper finds that the quantitative research about current urban spaces will be continually used for the urban planning and design in incremental areas through extracting the “urban genes” and constructing the “urban gene bank”. For this reason, this methodology can provide more reasonable and scientific reference for the urban planning and design practice.

Funds:

Brief Info of Author(s):

References:
  • [1] 万励, 金鹰. 国外应用城市模型发展回顾与新型空间政策模型综述[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2014(1): 81-91.
    [2] 史进, 童昕, 李天宏. 大尺度城市模型研究进展[J]. 城市规划, 2015(3): 104-112.
    [3] 杨鑫, 张琦, 吴思琦. 特大城市绿地格局多尺度、系统化比较研究——以北京、伦敦、巴黎、纽约为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 2017(3): 83-91.
    [4] 冷炳荣, 王真, 钱紫华, 等. 国内外大都市区规划实践及对重庆大都市区规划的启示[J]. 国际城市规划, 2016(6): 112-119.
    [5] 陈楠, 陈可石, 方丹青. 中心区的混合功能与城市尺度构建关系——新加坡滨海湾区模式的启示[J/OL]. 国际城市规划, (2016-07-18)[2017-04-10].
    http://www.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5583.tu.20160718.1426.001.html.
    [6] 吴唯佳, 唐燕, 向俊波, 等. 特大型城市发展和功能演进规律研究——伦敦、东京、纽约的国际案例比较[J]. 上海城市规划, 2014(6): 25-36.
    [7] 杨俊宴, 史北祥. 亚洲国际化城市中心区空间指标比较研究[J]. 城市规划, 2016(1): 32-42.
    [8] 马文军, 李旭英. 案例研究方法在城市规划与管理中的应用研究——兼论城市规划案例学的建构[J]. 规划师, 2008(8): 89-92.
    [9] 叶宇, 庄宇. 城市形态学中量化分析方法的涌现[J]. 城市设计, 2016(4): 56-65.
    [10] 翟宇佳, 徐磊青. 城市设计品质量化模型综述[J]. 时代建筑, 2016(2): 133-139.
    [11] HILLIER B, HANSON J. The social logic of space[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
    [12] BERGHAUSER P M, HAUPT P. Spacematrix: space, density and urban form[M]. NAI Publishers, 2010.
    [13] Van den Hoek J. The MXI (Mixed use Index). An Instrument for Antisprawl Policy[C]. 44th ISOCARP Congress, Dalian, China, 2008.
    [14] EWING R, CERVERO R. Travel and the built environment[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2009, 76(3): 265-294.
    [15] HANDY S L, BOARNET M G, EWING R, et al. How the built environment affects physical activity: views from urban planning[J]. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2002, 23(2): 64-73.
    [16] 伍敏, 杨一帆, 肖礼军. 空间句法在大尺度城市设计中的运用[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2014(2): 94-104.
    [17] 盛强. 社区级活力中心分布的空间逻辑——以北京三环内222 个街区内小商业聚集为例[J]. 国际城市规划, 2012(6): 61-68.
    [18] 叶宇, 庄宇. 新区空间形态与活力的演化假说:基于街道可达性、建筑密度及形态,以及功能混合度的整合分析[J]. 国际城市规划, 2017(2): 43-49.
    [19] 龙瀛, 刘伦. 新数据环境下定量城市研究的四个变革[J]. 国际城市规划, 2017(1): 39-48.
    [20] 龙瀛, 叶宇. 人本尺度城市形态:测度、效应评估及规划设计响应[J]. 南方建筑, 2016(5): 1-7.
    [21] LONG Y, LIU X. Automated Identification and Characterization of Parcels (AICP) with OpenStreetMap and Points of Interest[J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2016, 43(2): 498-510.
    [22] 龙瀛, 周垠. 街道活力的量化评价及影响因素分析——以成都为例[J]. 新建筑, 2016(1): 52-57.
    [23] 唐婧娴, 龙瀛, 翟炜, 等. 街道空间品质的测度、变化评价与影响因素识别——基于大规模多时相街景图片的分析[J]. 新建筑, 2016(5): 110-115.
    [24] 龙瀛, 沈尧. 数据增强设计——新数据环境下的规划设计回应与改变[J]. 上海城市规划, 2015(2): 81-87.
    [25] 龙瀛, 沈尧. 大尺度城市设计的时间、空间与人(TSP)模型——突破尺度与粒度的折中[J]. 城市建筑, 2016,16: 33-37.
    [26] 胡文娜. 国际新城新区建设实践( 十八) :法国新城——案例:马恩拉瓦莱新城(6)[J]. 城市规划通讯, 2015, 18: 17.
    [27] HAKLAY M, WEBER P. OpenStreetMap: user-generated street maps[J]. Pervasive Computing IEEE, 2008, 7(4):12-18.
    [28] GIRRES J, TOUYA G. Quality assessment of the French openstreetmap dataset[J]. Transactions in GIS, 2010, 14(4):435-459.
    [29] HAKLAY M. How good is volunteered geographical information? a comparative study of openstreetmap and ordnance survey datasets[J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2010, 93(4): 3-11.

TOP 10