Feng Canfang, Zhang Jingxiang, Chen Hao

Keywords： Embedded Governance; Corporatism; Spatial Development; Quasi-governmental Organization; Suzhou High-tech Zone

Abstract：

When it comes to the governance of spatial development in China, there are two competing views which are “government-led” and “market-led”. Since the theory of corporatism has great significance of theoretical guidance and policy revelation to the study of spatial development, we apply it to analyze the land production of Suzhou High-tech Zone, and clarify that the local government governed the society and market by embedding quasi-governmental organization, state-owned land property rights and public good, to achieve the goals of rapid space growth and social harmony. In conclusion, in the face of the increasing demands of the market and the society, the local government can use the embedded approach to absorb the new forces of market and society to participate in the urban governance, and enhance their ability to meet the requirements from the society, which can maintain the authority and flexibility of local governmental intervention in urban space development.

Funds：

• [1] 张京祥, 陈浩. 空间治理：中国城乡规划转型的政治经济学[J]. 城市规划, 2014, 38(11): 9-15.
  [2] 郭建伦. 土地非农化与地方经济发展下的中国大陆都市治理：大苏州地区开发区案例[D]. 台湾大学建筑与城乡研究所学位论文, 2005.
  [3] 殷洁, 罗小龙. 大事件背景下的城市政体变迁——南京市河西新城的实证研究[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(5): 38-44.
  [4] ZHANG J, WU F. Mega-event marketing and urban growth coalitions: a case study of Nanjing Olympic New Town[J]. Town Planning Review, 2008, 79(2/3): 209-226.
  [5] ZHU J. Local growth coalition: the context and implications of China’s gradualist urban land reforms[J]. International Journal of Urban & Regional Research, 1999, 23(3): 534-548.
  [6] 张京祥, 赵丹, 陈浩. 增长主义的终结与中国城市规划的转型[J]. 城市规划, 2013(1): 45-50.
  [7] 陈浩, 张京祥, 林存松. 城市空间开发中的“反增长政治”研究——基于南京“老城南事件”的实证[J]. 城市规划, 2015, 39(4): 19-26.
  [8] 赵燕菁. 城市增长模式与经济学理论[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2011(6): 12-19.
  [9] SU Y. The emerging regulatory state in China: a study of Shunde’s experience[D]. University of Hong Kong, 2003.
  [10] 张京祥, 殷洁, 罗小龙. 地方政府企业化主导下的城市空间发展与演化研究[J]. 人文地理, 2006, 21(4): 1-6.
  [11] ZHU J. Local developmental state and order in China’s urban development during transition[J]. International Journal of Urban & Regional Research, 2010, 28(2): 424-447.
  [12] 陈红太, 李严昌. 中国服务型政府的四种模式[J]. 中国行政管理, 2007(7): 103-106.
  [13] SCHMITTER P C. Still the century of corporatism[J]. Review of Politics, 1974, 36(1): 85-131.
  [14] SCHMITTER P C, GROTE J R. The corporatist sisyphus: past, present and future[J]. Papers, 1997.
  [15] 曹海军, 文长春.“ 统合主义”政府：一种新型的政府治理模式[J]. 理论探讨, 2006(4): 16-18.
  [16] WILLIAMSON P J. Varieties of corporatism: a conceptual discussion[M]. Cambridge University Press, 1985.
  [17] 肖滨. 中国政治学年度评论, 2012[M]. 上海人民出版社, 2012.
  [18] 张静. 法团主义：及其与多元主义的分歧[M]. 中国社会科学出版社, 2005.
  [19] 岳经纶, 邓智平. 依附、分立、嵌入：中国发展社会组织的三种逻辑[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2014(10): 67-70.
  [20] LIEFFERINK S D. The dynamics of policy arrangements: turning round the tetrahedron[M] // Institutional Dynamics in Environmental Governance.  Springer Netherlands, 2006: 45-68.
  [21] 李广斌, 王勇, 袁中金. 中国城市群空间演化的制度分析框架——基于法团主义的视角[J]. 城市规划, 2013, 37(10): 9-13.
  [22] 张汉. 地方统合主义与文化导向的城市更新：从轮船码头到宁波美术馆[J]. 开放时代, 2011(3): 103-112.
  [23] 刘为民. 法团主义与中国政治转型的新视角[J]. 理论与改革, 2005(4): 5-8.
  [24] 孟焕民. 崛起的热土：来自苏州各级开发区的报告[M]. 上海科学普及出版社, 1994.
  [25] 陈浩, 张京祥. 功能区与行政区“双轨制”：城市政府空间管理与创新——以南京市区为例[J]. 经济地理, 2017, 37(10): 1-9.