Wen Ping, Zhao Pengjun

Keywords： Infill Development; Urban Stock Land; Urban Regeneration; Potentiality Evaluation; Implementation Assessment

Abstract：

It is predictable that urban stock land will become the main land source for Chinese cities in the future. Some mature urban areas in the East Coast have transformed their land use policies from physical expansion to built-up area improvement. However, the main stream of current domestic practices and studies mainly focuses on land supply, rather than development on the stock land. This paper reviews the practices and studies of infill development on urban stock land from a global perspective, covering the whole process of policy-making, definition and classification, potential evaluation, obstacles and responses, implementation results, and impact assessment, providing references and experiences for future development in China.

Funds：

• [1] EWING R, HAMIDI S. Measuring sprawl 2014[R]. Smart Growth America,2014.

  [2] European Environment Agency. Urban sprawl in Europe: the ignored challenge[R]. Copenhagen: EEA, 2006.

  [3] ANTHONY J. Do state growth management regulations reduce sprawl?[J]. Urban Affairs Review, 2004, 39(3): 376-397.

  [4] JUN M J. The effects of Portland’s urban growth boundary on urban development patterns and commuting[J]. Urban Studies, 2004, 41(7): 1333-1348.

  [5] State of California. An urban strategy for California[R]. Sacramento: State of California, 1978.

  [6] ENGER S C. Infi l l development: strategies for shaping livable neighborhoods[R]. Seattle: Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington, 1997.

  [7] ELLMAN T. Infill: the cure for sprawl?[R] Goldwater Institute, 1997.

  [8] WHEELER S M. Infill development in the San Francisco Bay Area: current obstacles and responses[C]. Cleveland: Annual Conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, 2001.

  [9] HAUGHEY R. Urban infill housing: myth and fact[R]. Washington DC: Urban Land Institute, 2001.

  [10] INOSTROZA L, BAUR R, CSAPLOVICS E. Urban sprawl and fragmentation in Latin America: a dynamic quantification and characterization of spatial patterns[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013, 115: 87-97.

  [11] YUE W, LIU Y, FAN P. Measuring urban sprawl and its drivers in large Chinese cities: the case of Hangzhou[J]. Land Use Policy, 2013, 31: 358-370.

  [12] SCHNEIDER A, WOODCOCK C E. Compact, dispersed, fragmented, extensive? a comparison of urban growth in twenty-five global cities using remotely sensed data, pattern metrics and census information[J]. Urban Studies, 2008, 45(3): 659-692.

  [13] 张利, 雷军, 李雪梅, 等. 1997—2007 年中国城市用地扩张特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(5): 607-614.

  [14] 李郇, 陈刚强, 许学强. 中国城市异速增长分析[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(4): 399-407.

  [15] 杨艳昭, 封志明, 赵延德, 等. 中国城市土地扩张与人口增长协调性研究[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(9): 1668-1678.

  [16] 吴得文, 毛汉英, 张小雷, 等. 中国城市土地利用效率评价[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(8): 1111-1121.

  [17] 林坚, 杨有强, 苗春蕾. 中国城镇存量用地资源空间分异特征探析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2008, 22(1): 10-15.

  [18] 冯长春, 程龙. 老城区存量土地集约利用潜力评价——以北京市东城区为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 2010, 17(7): 86-92.

  [19] 王芃. 探索城市转型和可持续发展的新路径——《深圳市城市总体规划（2010—2020）》综述[J]. 城市规划, 2011, 35(8): 66-71.

  [20] Truckee Meadows Regional Planning Agency. Infill development: barriers and incentives[R]. Reno, Nevada: TMRPA, 2005.

  [21] Maryland Department of Planning. Managing Maryland’s growth: models and guidelines for infill development[R]. Baltimore: MDP, 2001.

  [22] FARRIS J T. The barriers to using urban infill development to achieve smart growth[J]. Housing Policy Debate, 2001, 12(1): 1-27.

  [23] STEINACKER A. Infill development and affordable housing: patterns from 1996 to 2000[J]. Urban Affairs Review, 2003, 38(4): 492-509.

  [24] SHI Y, SUN X, ZHU X, et al. Characterizing growth types and analyzing growth density distribution in response to urban growth patterns in periurban areas of Lianyungang City[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012, 105: 425-433.

  [25] RAMSEY K. Residential construction trends in America’s metropolitan regions: 2012 edition[R]. The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2012.

  [26] WHEELER S M. Smart infill: creating more livable communities in the Bay Area[R]. San Francisco: Greenbelt Alliance, 2002.

  [27] LANDIS J D, HOOD H, LI G, et al. The future of infill housing in California: opportunities, potential, feasibility and demand: volume one and volume two[R]. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, 2005.

  [28] ROWLEY S, PHIBBS P. Delivering diverse and affordable housing on infill development sites[R]. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, 2012.

  [29] MYERS D, GEARIN E. Current preferences and future demand for denser residential environments[J]. Housing Policy Debate, 2001, 12(4): 633-659.

  [30] Environmental Protection Agency. Smart growth and economic success: investing in infill development[R]. US EPA, 2014.

  [31] Idaho Smart Growth, Urban Land Institute Idaho. Quality infill: recommendations and tools[R]. Boise, Idaho: ISG and ULII, 2010.

  [32] PELTONEN L, SAIRINEN R. Integrating impact assessment and conflict management in urban planning: experiences from Finland[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2010, 30: 328-337.

  [33] KYATTA M, KAHILA M, BROBERG A. Perceived environmental quality as an input to urban infill policy-making[J]. Urban Design International, 2011, 16(1): 19-35.

  [34] WILEY K. An exploration of the impact of infill on neighborhood property values[D]. Baltimore: University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 2009.

  [35] MCCONNELL V, WILEY K. Infill development: perspectives and evidence from economics and planning[R]. Washington DC: Resources for the Future, 2010.

  [36] SIMONS R A, QUERCIA R G, MARIC I. The value impact of new residential construction and neighborhood disinvestment on residential sales price[J]. Journal of Real Estate Research, 1998, 15(1/2): 147-161.

  [37] DING C, SIMONS R, BAKU E. The effect of residential investment on nearby property values: evidence from Cleveland, Ohio[J]. Journal of Real Estate Research, 2000, 19(1/2): 23-48.

  [38] AMEKUDZI A, MCNEIL S, KOUTSOPOULOS H N. Assessing extrajurisdictional and areawide impacts of clustered brownfield developments[J]. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2003, 129(1): 27-44.

  [39] Idaho Smart Growth, Urban Land Institute Idaho. The consequences of residential infill development on existing neighborhoods in the Treasure Valley: a study and conclusions[R]. Boise, Idaho: ISG and ULII, 2007.

  [40] VALLANCE S, PERKINS H C, MOORE K. The results of making a city more compact: neighbours’ interpretation of urban infill[J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2005, 32: 715-733.

  [41] SCHETKE S, HAASE D, KOTTER T. Towards sustainable settlement growth: a new nulti-criteria assessment for implementing environmental targets into strategic urban planning[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2012, 32: 195-210.

  [42] PAULEIT S, ENNOS R, GOLDING Y. Modeling the environmental impacts of urban land use and land cover change: a study in Merseyside, the UK[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2005, 71: 295-310.

  [43] 谈明洪, 吕昌河. 城市用地扩展与耕地保护[J]. 自然资源学报, 2005, 20(1): 52-58.

  [44] 刘涛, 曹广忠. 中国城市用地规模的影响因素分析——以2005 年县级及以上城市为例[J]. 资源科学, 2011, 33(8): 1570-1577.

  [45] 叶晓敏. 城市闲置土地的分布特征与形成机理研究——以杭州市主城区为例[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2009.

  [46] 袁淑君. 长沙市闲置土地认定评价及潜力评价研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2009.

  [47] 罗遥. 江苏省城市闲置土地成因与处置研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2012.

  [48] 欧雄, 冯长春, 李方. 城镇土地利用潜力评价——以广州市天河区为例[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2007, 26(5): 100-104.

  [49] 石爱华, 范钟铭. 从“增量扩张”转向“存量挖潜”的建设用地规模调控[J]. 城市规划, 2011, 35(8): 88-90.

  [50] 邹兵. 由“增量扩张”转向“存量优化”——深圳市城市总体规划转型的动因与路径[J]. 规划师, 2013, 29(5): 5-10.

  [51] 刘江涛, 傅晓东. 存量土地开发模式下市政影响评价机制探讨[C] //青岛: 城市时代，协同规划——2013 中国城市规划年会论文集, 2013.