He Yang, Li Wenjing

Keywords： Urban Planning; Municipal Finance; Policy Coordination; Infrastructure Financing; Sustainability

Abstract：

Cities rely on rational planning strategies to develop over time. A rational urban planning must not only meet the needs of manufacturing and daily lives, but also depend on sufficient financial support to implement it. In the process of rapid urbanization in China, the public finance system at the level of urbanized areas has been absent. There is a certain degree of disconnection between urban finance and urban planning. Some irrational phenomena such as “finance for planning” and “planning for finance”have emerged. The former leads to the increased financial pressure on local governments and the tendency of excessive borrowing. The latter would increase land finance revenues for local governments, but might cause waste of resources and a large number of “unfinished” projects due to the repetitive planning and inefficient urban expansion. To address the above issues, it is necessary for urban finance and urban planning to coordinate with each other. Urban planners should take financial affordability into consideration when proposing urban planning strategies. Meanwhile, urban finance policies are expected to be continuously optimized to provide sustainable financial support for the future urban planning.

Funds：

• [1] 刘志, 黄志基. 中国城市财政可持续发展: 挑战与出路[J]. 政府管理评论, 2018(1): 59-74.

  [2] 吕冰洋. 央地关系: 寓活力于秩序[M]. 北京：商务印书馆, 2022.

  [3] 张清勇. 纵向财政竞争、讨价还价与中央——地方的土地收入分成——对20 世纪80 年代以来土地收入的考察[J]. 制度经济学研究, 2008(4): 107-127.

  [4] 汤玉刚, 陈强. 分权、土地财政与城市基础设施[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2012(6): 98-110.

  [5] 徐军伟, 毛捷, 管星华. 地方政府隐性债务再认识——基于融资平台公司的精准界定和金融势能的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(9): 37-59.

  [6] 王朝才, 赵全厚, 朱新华, 等. 基于基层财政视角的地方政府间财政关系研究[J]. 经济研究参考, 2008(64): 21-41.

  [7] 白景明, 王思轩. 规划和预算: 如何有效衔接[J]. 中国投资( 中英文), 2019(11): 52-53.

  [8] 聂伟, 陆军. 撤县设区改革与地级市经济增长——整县设区和拆县设区的比较研究[J]. 经济问题探索, 2019(2): 95-101.

  [9] 徐升艳, 郭行. 撤县设区是否增加了地方政府土地出让收入?[J]. 开发研究, 2021(3): 147-152.

  [10] 纪小乐, 魏建, 李欣泽. 撤县设区VS. 切块扩区: 地级市扩大市辖区经济发展效应的实证研究[J]. 广东社会科学, 2018(6): 46-57.

  [11] 邵朝对, 苏丹妮, 包群. 中国式分权下撤县设区的增长绩效评估[J]. 世界经济, 2018, 41(10): 101-125.

  [12] 张清源, 苏国灿, 梁若冰. 增加土地供给能否有效抑制房价上涨——利用“撤县设区”的准实验研究[J]. 财贸经济, 2018, 39(4): 20-34.

  [13] 张莉, 年永威, 刘京军. 土地市场波动与地方债——以城投债为例[J]. 经济学( 季刊), 2018, 17(3): 1103-1126.

  [14] 段树军. 收紧调整权限 给撤县设区热降温[N]. 中国经济时报, 2022-06-27(001).

  [15] 李学. 利益扩张型虚假城市化现象的激励机制探析[J]. 社会科学, 2007(5): 14-20.

  [16] 宿凤鸣. 韩国高质交通基建规划管理与投融资创新经验[J]. 综合运输, 2019, 41(5): 104-108.

  [17] 陈霞. 美国基础设施融资机制对我国新基建的启示[J]. 中国财政, 2021(9): 20-22.

  [18] BAHL R W, LINN J F. Governing and financing cities in the developing world[M]. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2014.