彼得· 施密特 著 许俊萍 译

Peter Schmitt

关键词：欧盟政策和策略；中小城镇；多中心发展；国土议程；城市层面

Keywords：EU Policies and Strategies; Small and Medium-sized Cities and Towns; Polycentric Development; Territorial Agenda; Urban Dimension

摘要：

文章主要讨论了欧盟中小城镇的发展策略。首先分析了中小城镇的作用和潜力，接下来总结了欧盟对中小城镇越来越多的关注和相关政策，反映了欧盟在政策框架下整合城市问题的决心。文章还批判性地分析了欧盟政策框架下的一些主要文件、方案以及相关的规范性概念。欧盟政策框架中越来越多地出现所谓“城市层面”的各类战略，然而专门的设计、国土发展重点以及与中小城镇的关系仍不明确。

Abstract：

This paper primarily discusses strategies for the development of small and medium-sized cities and towns in Europe Union. The roles and potentials of small and medium-sized cities and towns are analyzed firstly. Then it primarily summarizes the growing concerns and related policies on medium-sized cities and towns in the following part, which reflected the ambitions to integrate urban issues within the EU policy framework. Some of the major policy documents and programmes as well as related normative concepts of the EU policy framework are critically analyzed. The so-called ‘urban dimension’ is emerging in various strategies within the EU policy framework, whereas its specific design and territorial focus, also in relation to small and medium-sized cities and towns, remains to be rather vague.

作者：彼得施密特，瑞典斯特哥尔摩大学人文地理系客座教员

译者：许俊萍，美国德克萨斯农工大学景观与城市规划系博士研究生

• [1] BBSR. Metropolitan Areas in Europe, BBSR-Online-Publication, No.

  01/ 2011[2012-12-16]. http://www.bbsr.bund.de/nn_147528/BBSR/EN/

  Publications/OnlinePublications/2011/ON012011.html.

  [2] Damsgaard O, Lindqvist M, Roto J, Sterling J. Territorial Potentials in the

  European Union. Stockholm: Nordregio Working Paper, 2009: 6.

  [3] CEC. Cities of Tomorrow. Challenges, Visions, Ways Forward. 2011.

  [4] Gl?ersen E, Dubois A, Schmitt P. Medium-Sized Towns in a Context

  of Globalisation and Metropolisation: Grounds for Pro-active Policies

  in the South Baltic. Report for the Baltic Sea Region INTERREG IIIBproject:

  ‘SEBco’ - City-Hinterland Cooperation as Motor for Regional

  Development in the South Eastern Baltic. 2007[2012-12-15]. http://www.

  nordregio.se/Global/Staff/Peter/sebco_report_-_final_revised_v10.pdf.

  [5] OECD. OECD Territorial Reviews: Competitive Cities in the Global

  Economy. 2006: 446.

  [6] RWI, DIFU, NEA and PRAC. Second State of European Cities Report,

  November 2010, Research Project for the European Commission, DG

  Regional Policy. 2010.

  [7] Duehr S, Colomb C, Nadin V. European Spatial Planning and Territorial

  Cooperation[M]. London and New York: Routledge, 2010.

  [8] CEC. Europe 2000: Outlook for the Development of the Community’s

  Territory. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European

  Communities, 1991.

  [9] Kunzmann K R, Wegener M. Pattern of Urbanisation in Western Europe

  1960-1990. Report for the Directorate General XVI of the Commission

  of the European Communities as Part of the Study ‘Urbanisation and the

  Function of Cities in the European Community’, Schriften des Instituts für

  Raumplanung, Bd. 28. 1991.

  [10] Stead D. Views on Sustainable Urban Planning from Europe[J]. Nordregio

  News, 2011(2): 3-5.

  [11] CEC. European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards Balanced and

  Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU. Luxembourg: Office

  for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1999.

  [12] TA 2007. Towards a More Competitive and Sustainable Europe of Diverse

  Regions, Agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers on Urban

  Development and Territorial Cohesion in Leipzig[EB/OL]. 2007[2012-

  12-22]. http://www.eu-territorial-genda.eu/Reference%20Documents/

  Territorial-Agenda-of-the-European-Union-Agreed-on-25-May-2007.pdf.

  [13] TA 2020. Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse

  Regions, Agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers

  Responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development on 19th May

  2011[EB/OL]. G?d?ll?, Hungary, 2011[2012-12-22]. http://www.eu2011.

  hu/files/bveu/documents/TA2020.pdf.

  [14] Faludi A. Cohesion, Coherence, Cooperation: European Spatial Planning

  Coming of Age?[M]. London and New York: Routledge, 2010.

  [15] Schmitt P. The Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020 – A Turning

  国际城市规划 2013 Vol.28, No.5 9

  Point in Striving for Territorial Cohesion? [J]. Nordregio News Publication,

  2011(1): 3-8.

  [16] CEC. Promoting Sustainable Urban Development in Europe. Achievements

  and Opportunities, 2009.

  [17] ECOTEC, ECORYS, ECORYS-NEI, IRS, MCRI, Nordregio, ?IR, SDRU.

  ESPON 2.2.3: Territorial Effects of the Structural Funds in Urban Areas –

  Final Report. 2006.

  [18] CEC. Fostering the Urban Dimension. Analysis of the Operational

  Programmes Co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund

  (2007-2013), 2008.

  [19] ECORYS. The Urban Dimension of the ERDF in the 2007-2013 Period:

  Implementation and Practice in Five European Cities – Final Report to the

  European Commission. 2010.

  [20] EESC. Working Documet: Metropolitan Areas and City Regions in Europe.

  2011.

  [21] Mendez C, Bachtler J, Wishlade F. Comparative Study on the Visions

  and Options for Cohesion Policy After 2013. Report Requested by the

  European Parliamnet’s Committeeon Regional Development. 2011.

  [22] B?hme K, Waterhout B. The Europeanization of Planning. In A Faludi

  (Ed.), European Spatial Research and Planning. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln

  Institute of Land Policy, 2008: 225-248.

  [23] Dühr S, Stead D, Zonneveld W. The Europeanization of Spatial Planning

  Through Territorial Cooperation[J]. Planning Practice and Research, 2007,

  22(3): 291-307.

  [24] Kunzmann K R. The Europeanisation of Spatial Planning[M] // N Adams,

  J Alden, N Harris(eds). Regional Development and Spatial Planning in an

  Enlarged European Union. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.

  [25] Meijers E, Waterhout B, Zonneveld W A M. Closing the Gap: Territorial

  Cohesion Through Polycentric Development, European Journal of Spatial

  Development, Refereed Articles, No 24. 2007[2012-12-13]. http://www.

  nordregio.se/EJSD/refereed24.pdf.

  [26] Nadin V, Stead D. Opening up the Compendium: An Evaluation of

  International Comparative Planning Research Methodologies[J]. European

  Planning Stdudies, 2013.

  [27] Schmitt P. Raumpolitische Diskurse um Metropolregionen in Deutschland

  – Positionen, Kontroversen, Perspektiven[M] // Knieling J, Matern

  A(eds.). Metropolregionen – Innovation, Wettbewerb, Handlungsf?higkeit.

  Hanover: German Academy for Spatial Research, 2009: 60-100.

  [28] Zaucha J, Komornicki T, B?hme K, Swiatek D, Zuber P. Territorial Keys

  for Bringing Closer the Territorial Agenda of the EU and Europe 2020[J].

  European Planning Studies, 2012.

  
  

  
  

• 收起