点击排行
 
正文
全文下载次数:0
2012年第2期   DOI:
促进城市的可持续发展:多维度、多尺度的城市形态研究——中美城市形态研究
A Multi-disciplinary, Multi-scale Agenda of Urban Form Studies Toward Sustainable Development: A Literature Review on Urban Form Studies in the USA and China

刘志丹 张纯 宋彦

Liu Zhidan, Zhang Chun, Song Yan

关键词:城市形态;多维度;多尺度;公共政策

Keywords:Urban Form; Multi-disciplinary Analysis; Multi-scale Analysis; Public Policy

摘要:

20 世纪80 年代中期开始,人们对城市土地粗放利用、空间无序蔓延的批判和反思,以及对精明城市形态的寻求,重新引起了美国城市规划者和政策制定者对城市形态的研究兴趣。本文综述了美国和中国城市形态研究的主要文献,认为中国的城市形态研究目前主要分别集中于城市地理学、城市规划、建筑和城市设计等领域,尚未进行跨领域的研究。而从过去20 多年美国相关研究进展来看,美国的城市形态研究趋向于多尺度下的多维度形态识别,即可分为景观生态、城市经济、城市交通、城市社区以及城市设计等五个维度,分别对应大区域、大都市区、次区域、社区和街区等五个尺度。这些多维度、多尺度的城市形态研究成果对制定城市公共政策有直接相关意义。美国城市形态研究的最新进展不仅可以为中国城市形态研究提供启示,也将为21 世纪中国城市塑造更健康、可持续的城市形态提供借鉴。

Abstract:

This paper reviews recent literature on urban form in both China and the USA. Based on the review in China, it shows that research on urban form in China mainly concentrates on fields such us urban geography, urban planning, architecture and urban design.The review in the USA reveals a multi-disciplinary, multi-scale, and policy-oriented agenda. Research involves five disciplines: landscape ecology, economic structure, transportation planning, neighborhood planning and urban design; these disciplines are in correspondence to five scales: regional, metropolitan, sub-metropolitan, neighborhood and blocks. Recent progress on urban form research in the USA will not only shed light on research contents, but also provide implications for the creation of healthier and sustainable urban form in China in the 21st century. 

版权信息:
基金项目:
作者简介:

刘志丹,深圳大学建筑与城市规划学院,硕士研究生。zhidanliu111@gmail.com 

张纯,北京大学城市与环境学院博士后,北京大学- 林肯研究院城市发展与土地政策研究中心研究员。zhangch@plc.pku.edu.cn, zici0723@126.com 

宋彦,深圳大学城市规划系教授,美国北卡罗莱纳大学教堂山分校城市与区域规划系终身副教授。ys@email.unc.edu 


译者简介:

参考文献:
  • [1] Williams K E Burton, et al., Eds. Achieving sustainable urban form[M]. London, New York: E & FN Spon, 2000. 

    [2] Jens M, E Burton, et al. The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form[M]. London: E &FN Spon, an imprint of Chpman and Hall, 1996. 

    [3] Talen E. Measuring urbanism: issues in smart growth research[J]. Journal of Urban Design, 2003, 8(3): 195–215. 

    [4] Clifton K, R Ewing, et al. Quantitative analysis of urban form: a multidisciplinary review[J]. Journal of Urbanism, 2003, 1(1): 17-45. 

    [5] Conzen M R G. Alnwick, Northumberland: A Study in Town-plan Analysis. Institute of British Geographers Publication 27 George Philip, London,1960. 

    [6] Whitehand J W R. The Basis for a Historico-geographical Theory of Urban Form. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1977, New Series(2): 400-416. 

    [7] Park R E and E W Burgess. The City: Suggestions for Investigation of Human Behavior in the Urban Environment, Macmillan Co, 1925. 

    [8] Hoyt H. The Structure and Growth of Residential Neighborhoods in American Cities. Washington, D.C., Federal Housing Administration,1939. 

    [9] Harris C D. and E L Ullman. The Nature of Cities. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1945: 7-17. 

    [10] Appleyard D. Livable Streets[M]. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press,1945. 

    [11] 谷凯. 城市形态的理论与方法_ 探索全面与理性的研究框架[J]. 城市规划, 2001, 25(2): 36-42. 

    [12] Lynch K. Image of the city[M]. Cambridge,MA, MIT Press, 1960. 

    [13] Alexander C. A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction[M]. New York Oxford University Press, 1977. 

    [14] Logan R and H Molotch. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place[M]. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press, 1987. 

    [15] Wu F L. Real Estate Development and the Transformation of Urban Space in China’s Transitional Economy. The Future of Chinese Cities: A Research Agenda for the 21st Century. Shanghai, 1999. 

    [16] Quattrochi D A. and R E Pelletier. Remote sensing for analysis of landscapes. Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. M G Turner and R H Gardner. New York, NY, Springer, 1999: 51-76. 

    [17] Alberti M. Urban patterns and environmental performance: what do we know?[J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1999, 19: 151- 163. 

    [18] McGarigal K. About landscape ecology (online). Retrieved 2004-1-1, 2004. 

    [19] Forman R T T and M Godron. Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology[J]. BioScience, 1981, 31: 733-740. 

    [20] Godron M and R Forman. Landscape modification and changing ecological characteristics. Disturbance and ecosystems: components of 

    response. H. A. M. a. M. Godron. New York, NY, Springer, 1982: 12-27. 

    [21] Randolph J. Environmental land use planning and management[J]. Washington, DC, Island, 2004. 

    [22] Robbins C S, Ed. Managing suburban forest fragments for birds. Challenges in the conservation of biological resources: a practitioner’s guide. Boulder, CO, Westview, 2004. 

    [23] Ewing R. Best development practices. Chicago, IL, American Planning Association, 1996. 

    [24] Adams L W. Urban wildlife habitats – a landscape perspective[M]. Minneapolis, MN:, University of Minnesota Press, 1994. 

    [25] Getz M. Optimum city size: fact or fancy?[J]. Law and Contemporary Problems, 1979, 43(2): 197-210. 

    [26] Newman P and J Kensworthy. Sustainability and cities: overcoming automobile dependence[M]. Washington, DC, Island, 1998. 

    [27] Rosenthal S S and W C Strange . Geography, industrial organization and agglomeration[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2003, 85(2): 377- 393. 

    [28] Mills E. Sectoral clustering and metropolitan development. Sources of metropolitan growth. E Mills and J F McDonald. New Brunswick,NJ, Rutgers Center for Urban Policy Research, 1992: 3-18. 

    [29] Glaeser E L and M E Kahn. Sprawl and urban growth. Cambridge, MA, Harvard Institute of Economic Research, 2003. 

    [30] Loutzenheiser D R. Pedestrian access to transit: model of walk trips and their design and urban form determinants around bay area rapid transit stations[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1997, 1604: 40-49. 

    [31] Ewing R e. a. Identifying and measuring urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 2006 (3): 223–240. 

    [32] Pushkar A O, B J Hollingworth, et al. A multivariate regression model for estimating greenhouse gas emissions from alternative neighborhood designs. 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC, 2000. 

    [33] Geertman S C M and J R Ritsema van Eck. GIS and models of accessibility potential: an application in planning[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 1995, 9(1): 67-80. 

    [34] Boarnet M G and R Crane. Travel by design: the influence of urban form[M]. New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 2001. 

    [35] Cervero R and K Kockelman. Travel demand and the 3 Ds: density, diversity, and design[J]. Transportation Research D,1997, 2(3): 199–219. 

    [36] Dill J. Measuring the network connectivity for bicycling and walking. The 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC, USA, 2004. 

    [37] Song Y and G J Knaap. New urbanism and housing values: A disaggregate assessment[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2003, 54(2): 218-238. 

    [38] Clifton K J, A D Livi-Smith, et al. The development and testing of an audit for the pedestrian environment[M]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 80(1-2): 95–110. 

    [39] Giles-Corti B and R J Donovan. The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity[J]. Social Science and Medicine, 2002, 54: 1793–1812. 

    [40] Kitamura R, P L Mokhtarian, et al. A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighbourhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area[J]. Transportation, 1997, 24: 125–158. 

    [41] Clifton K and A Livi. Gender differences in walking behavior, attitudes about walking and perceptions of the environment in three Maryland communities. Conference on women’s issues in transportation. Chicago, IL, USA, 2004. 

    [42] Hess P M. e. a. Site design and pedestrian travel[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1999, 1674: 9–19. 

    [43] Mehta V. Lively streets: determining environmental characteristics to support social behavior[J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2007, 27: 165-187. 

    [44] 熊国平. 90 年代以来我国城市形态演变的特征[J]. 新建筑, 2006, (3): 19-21. 

    [45] 韦亚平, 赵民. 都市区空间结构与绩效——多种心网络结构的解释与应用分析[J]. 城市规划, 2006, 30(4): 11-16. 

    [46] 李后强, 艾南山. 具有黄金分割特征和分形性质的市场网络[J]. 经济地理,1992,12(4): 1-5. 

    [47] 林炳耀. 城市空间形态的计量方法及其评价[J]. 城市规划汇刊,1998, (3): 42-46. 

    [48] 姜世国, 周一星). 北京城市形态的分形集聚特征及其实践意义[J]. 地理研究, 2006, 25(2): 204-212. 

    [49] 陈彦光 , 黄昆. 城市形态的分形维数: 理论探讨与实践教益[J]. 信阳师范学院学报, 2002, 15(1): 62-67. 

    [50] 郑莘, 林琳. 1990 年以来国内城市形态研究述评[J]. 城市规划, 2002, 26(7): 59-64. 

    [51] 段进. 城市空间发展论[M]. 南京, 江苏科学技术出版社, 1999. 

    [52] 段进. 城市形态研究与空间战略规划[J]. 城市规划, 2003, 27(2): 45- 48. 

    [53] 费移山. 城市形态与城市交通相关性研究[D]. 建筑系. 南京, 东南大学. 硕士论文, 2003. 

    [54] 张昌娟,金广君. 论紧凑城市概念下城市设计的作为[J]. 国际城市规划, 2009, 24(6): 108-117. 

《国际城市规划》编辑部    北京市车公庄西路10号东楼E305/320    100037
邮箱:upi@vip.163.com  电话:010-58323806  传真:010-58323825
京ICP备13011701号-6  京公网安备11010802014223

7793381