邓涛涛 冯苏苇

Deng Taotao, Feng Suwei

关键词：拥挤收费；小城市；杜伦；英国

Keywords：Congestion Charge; Small City; Durham; the UK

摘要：

本文介绍了中文文献较少提及的道路拥挤收费在小城市中应用的实例。本文对英国第一个将拥挤收费付诸实施的城市——杜伦进行案例研究，分析了杜伦拥挤收费方案出台的历史背景、具体实施方案、相关配套措施以及实施后取得的效果。研究发现，杜伦在实施拥挤收费后，道路拥挤状况得到明显改善，公众对拥挤收费方案的支持率也显著提高。当前我国大城市由于种种原因，试行拥挤收费举步维艰，本文指出可在初期选择小城市的拥挤街道进行政策试点，减少政策风险，同时进行很好的经验积累。

Abstract：

This paper introduces the case of road congestion charge applied in a small city, which is rarely discussed in China's literatures. The paper takes Durham as a case study, which is the first city to implement congestion charge in the UK. It analyzes the historical background of implementing the road congestion charge scheme, the specific implementation measures, the relevant supporting measures and consequent results. This study reveals that the road congestion condition has got clear improvement in Durham and the public support of congestion pricing schemes has also been significantly improved after the scheme was implemented in Durham. The paper points out that it is quite difficult to implement road congestion pricing in big cities due to certain problems. It might be better to implement the congestion pricing scheme in the crowded streets in small cities firstly, so as to avoid policy risk and get experience.

邓涛涛，博士，上海财经大学财经研究所，助理研究员。deng.taotao@mail.shufe.edu.cn

冯苏苇，博士，上海财经大学公共经济与管理学院，副教授。fsuwei@mail.shufe.edu.cn

• [1] 隽志才, 宗芳, 富晓艳. TDM 政策实施及评价综述[J]. 中国软科学,

  2007(1): 156-160.

  [2] 马祖琦. 伦敦中心区“交通拥挤收费政策”——背景、经验与启示[J].

  国外城市规划, 2004, 19(1): 42-45.

  [3] 马祖琦. 伦敦中心区“交通拥挤收费”的运作效果、最新进展与相关

  思考[J]. 国际城市规划, 2007(3): 85-90.

  [4] 薛美根, 程杰. 伦敦道路拥挤收费政策[J]. 城市交通, 2007, 5(6): 14-18.

  [5] 刘明君, 朱锦, 毛保华. 伦敦拥堵收费政策、效果与启示[J]. 交通运输

  系统工程与信息, 2011, 11(1): 146-151.

  [6] 马祖琦, 冯苏苇, 余凯. 斯德哥尔摩内城交通拥挤收费政策述评[J]. 城

  市问题, 2011(8): 2-9.

  [7] John McGargill. Congestion Charging: The Durham Experience[EB/OL].

  The ITS-UK Conference, 2011. www.its-uk.org.uk/filelibrary/Durham1.

  pdf .

  [8] Ministry of Transport. Road pricing: The Economic and Technical

  Possibilities[M]. London: H.M. Stationery Off, 1964.

  [9] Stephen Ison. Pricing Road Space: Back to the Future? The Cambridge

  Experience[J]. Transport Reviews, 1996(16): 109-126.

  [10] Acts of Parliament. Transport Act 2000c. 38[M]. London: H.M. Stationery

  Off. 2000. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/38/contents.

  [11] Petros Ieromonachou, Stephen Potter, Marcus Enoch. Adapting Strategic

  Niche Management for Evaluating Radical Transport Policies––The Case

  of the Durham Road Access Charging Scheme[J]. International Journal of

  Transport Management, 2004, 2(2): 75-87.

  [12] Durham County Council. Saddler Street Road User Charge Scheme

  Monitoring Report[R]. Durham: Durham County Council, 2003.

  [13] 周江评. 交通拥挤收费——最新国际研究进展和案例[J]. 城市规划,

  2010, 34(11): 47-54.

  [14] Transport for London. Central London Congestion Charging: Impacts

  Monitoring, Sixth Annual Report [R]. London, 2008.

  [15] 姚红云, 孙立军, 冯晓. 公车影响城市实施交通拥挤收费策略的理论

  研究[J]. 同济大学学报( 自然科学版), 2008, 36(1): 42-46.

  [16] 张中安, 冯苏苇. 公务车与私家车博弈下的交通拥挤收费效果研究[J].

  交通运输系统工程与信息, 2008, 8(2): 85-90.

  
  

  
  

• 收起