顾媛媛 邢忠 陈子龙 乔欣 靳桥

Gu Yuanyuan, Xing Zhong, Chen Zilong, Qiao Xin, Jin Qiao

关键词：“空间—社会”关系 ；保障房 ；包容性住房计划 ；包容性住区 ；社会融合

Keywords：Spatial-Social Relation; Social Housing; Inclusionary Housing Program; Inclusive Neighborhood; Social Incorporation

摘要：

如何将公租房等保障性住房无差别地融入城市住区，规避低收入群体集聚、 空间失配可能衍生的社会问题，受到业界与社会关注。文章以美国包容性住房 计划中蕴含的“空间—社会”关系及其对社会关系再生产的影响作为研究探讨 主线，对包容性住房计划概念及其内涵进行解析 ；并结合我国保障房建设可能 潜存的社会问题，梳理美国包容性计划的刚性保障指标保障、弹性政策激励和 无差别空间融合措施，归纳出对我国保障房建设的启示 ：将保障房无差别融入 商品房住区，使包括中低收入群体的全体居民从社会生活中得到空间网络带来 的效益，以空间融合促进社会和谐，促进积极社会关系再生产。

Abstract：

How to integrate social housing and public rental housing into urban housing system, to avoid social problems derided with the construction of low-income areas, draws a lot of attentions from both academy and society. Taking the “space-society” correlation and its influence on the reproduction of social relations as the main thread, the paper tends to detect the concept and connotation of inclusionary housing programs in the United States from the perspective of “space-society” relationship. The paper tends to comb various policies with the coexistence of mandatory and flexible guarantee incentives and spatial measures for all parties to jointly promote the construction of inclusive housing program. Furtherly, remarkable reflections are concluded as following: incorporate affordable housing into city neighborhoods indiscriminatingly, benefit all the residents including the low-income groups from the spatial network, and achieve social harmony by spatial integration, catalyze reproduction of positive social relationship.

顾媛媛，重庆大学山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室，重庆大学建 筑城规学院，副教授，研究生导师。maysmile@foxmail.com  

邢忠，重庆大学山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室，重庆大学建筑 城规学院，教授，博士生导师。1178111403@qq.com 

陈子龙，硕士，云南省发展与改革委员会。1206594433@qq.com 

乔欣，重庆大学规划设计研究院有限公司，高级工程师。qiaoxxx@163.com 

靳桥，重庆大学规划设计研究院有限公司，工程师。8485695@qq.com

• [1] 吴宾 , 王亚菲 . 论公共住房空间失配的演化机理及其社会影响 [J]. 山东农业大学学报 ( 社会科学版 ), 2015, 17(2): 7-11.

  [2] 赵聚军 . 保障房空间布局失衡与中国大城市居住隔离现象的萌发中国行政管理 , 2014, (7): 60-63, 68.

  [3] 邵祁峰 . 保障性住区的空间生产与社会再造 [D]. 南京 : 南京大学2013.

  [4] 吴宇哲 , 王薇 . 住房保障与城市经济增长协同机制研究 [J]. 河海大学学报 ( 哲学社会科学版 ), 2016,18(6): 27-33, 95.

  [5] 高鉴国 . 新马克思主义城市理论 [M]. 商务印书馆 , 2006.

  [6] 张京祥 , 陈浩 . 南京市典型保障性住区的社会空间绩效研究——空间生产的视角 [J]. 现代城市研究 , 2012, 27(6): 66-71.

  [7] 洪亮平 , 王旭 . 美国保障性住房政策变迁及其启示 [J]. 城市发展研究2013, 20(6): 129-134.

  [8] 宋伟轩 . 大城市保障性住房空间布局的社会问题与治理途径 [J]. 城市发展研究 , 2011, 18(8): 103-108.

  [9] 徐苗 , 马雪雯 . 基于社会融合视角的保障性住房研究评述及启示 [部人居环境学刊 , 2015(5): 93-99.

  [10] 杨碧波 . 重庆保障房社区非正规就业群体职住空间失配研究 [D]. 重庆重庆大学 , 2017.

  [11] 王承慧 , 章毓婷 . 大型保障房社区公共设施供给机制优化研究 [J]. 城市规划学刊 , 2017(2): 96-103.

  [12] 谢义维 . 主要发达国家住房保障制度及中国的实践研究 [D]. 长春林大学 , 2014.

  [13] 陈玉 . 普鲁伊特·艾格社区的生与死——一个美国公共住房案例的解读 [J]. 规划师 , 2013, 29(4): 105-110.

  [14] Inclusionary housing in California: 30 years of innovation[R]. California Coalition for Rural Housing and Non-profit Housing Association Northern California, 2003: 7.

  [15] WIENER R J, BARTON S E. The underpinnings of inclusionary housing in California: current practice and emerging market and legal challenges Journal of housing & the built environment, 2014, 29(3): 403-422.

  [16] SCHWARTZ A F. Housing policy in the United States[M]. Routledge, 2010

  [17] 张娟 . 美国包容性区划对我国保障性住房建设的启示 [J]. 城市规划2011, 35(9): 41-46.

  [18] 易成栋 , 黄友琴 , 李玉瑶 . 包容性住房政策 ：理论思辨与国际评估中国房地产 , 2019(33): 42-49. 

  [19] RUSK D. Nine lessons for inclusionary zoning keynote remarks of David Rusk to the National Inclusionary Housing Conference[R]. Washington DC, 2005: 3. 

  [20] The New York City Council. The inclusionary housing text amendment update. July 29, 2009[EB/OL]. [2020-05-21]. http://www.nyc.gov/html/html/inclusionary_housing/index.shtml.

  [21] 黄潇仪 , 吴晓 . 基于贫困疏解视角的美国保障性住房政策审视 [J]. 现代城市研究 , 2012, 27(11): 71-79.

  [22] LEFEBVRE H, ELDEN S, MOORE G. Rhythm analysis: space, time everyday life[M]. Continuum, 2004.

  [23] HARVEY D. The urban experience[M]. B. Blackwell, 1989.

  [24] REGUS L, SLOVIN S, VINIT M. Can inclusionary zoning be an effective efficient housing policy[J]. Journal of urban affairs, 2010(2): 229-252.

  [25] FULTON W, SHIGLEY P. California planning[M]. 3rd ed. Point Arena California: Solano Press Books, 2005: 135.

  [26] 柴康妮 . 美国当前住房保障政策面临问题与解决方案——以马萨诸塞州为例 [J]. 中国房地产 , 2017, 36(7): 41-49.

  [27] LEONARD H J. Managing Oregon’s growth, the politics of development planning[M]. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation, 1985.

  [28] ROBERT B W, CATHERINE G C. Inclusionary zoning: pros and cons[M].HIGGINS B. California inclusionary housing reader. Institute for Local

  Government, 2003.

  [29] PYATOK M. Inclusionary housing: some doubts[M] // HIGGINS B. California Inclusionary Housing Reader. Institute for Local Self Government, 2003.

  [30] DIAGNE A F, KURBAN H, SCHMUTZ B. Are inclusionary housing programs color-blind? the case of Montgomery County MPDU Program[J].  Journal of housing economics, 2018, 40: 6-24. 

  [31] RUCKER L, SCHNEIDER A. Inclusionary zoning. market-financed affordable housing–could Vienna benefit from this American approach?[J] . Der Offentliche Sektor, 2019, 45(1): 35-48.  

  [32] CAWLEY D G. Law and inclusive urban development: lessons from Chile’s enabling markets housing policy regime[J]. The American journal of comparative law, 2019, 67(3): 587-636.

  [33] MOUSSE M, WINODLEY T, RAVENTON N, et al. Mixed use planning: who can afford it?[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2018, 84(1): 7-20. 

  [34] STEIN S. Progress for whom, toward what? progressive politics and New York City’ s mandatory inclusive housing[J]. Journal of urban affairs, 2018, 40(6): 770-781.

  [35] HAMILTON E. Inclusionary zoning hurts more than it helps[R]. Fairfax: Mercatus Center at George Mason University, 2019: 9.

  [36] WASHINGTON E. Inclusionary zoning and housing market outcomes[J]. Mercatus research paper, 2019: 9.

  [37] CHEN Z, HUANG Y, HUANG X. Public support for inclusionary housing in urban China[J]. International journal of housing policy, 2019, 19(4): 457-482.

  [38] 王薇 . 保障房供给的城市包容性增长机理与效应研究 [D]. 杭州 : 浙江大学 , 2019.

  [39] 陈思圆 . 保障性住房供给对不同收入阶层居民消费的影响研究 [D]. 上海 : 华东师范大学 , 2018.

  [40] NZAU B, TRILLO C. Affordable housing provision in informal settlements through land value capture and inclusionary housing[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(15): 5975.

  
  

• 收起