点击排行
 
正文
全文下载次数:343
2022年第6期   DOI:10.19830/j.upi.2020.371
基于多元主体的城市绿地空间协作规划实施机制研究 —— 以奥地利维也纳都市花园为例
Research on the Implementation Mechanism of Urban Green Space Collaborative Planning with Multiple Stakeholders Based on the Urban Gardening Planning in Vienna, Austria

李帅 彭震伟

Li Shuai, Peng Zhenwei

关键词:协作规划;绿地空间;多元主体;实施机制;都市花园;维也纳

Keywords:Collaborative Planning; Green Space; Multiple Stakeholders; Implementation Mechanism; Urban Gardening; Vienna

摘要:

协作规划能有效协调城市绿地空间多元主体间的利益矛盾,例如奥地利维也纳都市花园协作规划经过近40 年发展已取得瞩目成绩。本文以维也纳都市花园协作规划为研究对象,通过实际调查与走访,聚焦其规划编制、实施、反馈的规划全过程,梳理其多元主体参与、灵活空间使用、多样价值实现的规划特征,进而解析其协作规划实施机制:(1)由行政部门、政府组织、专业团队和城市公众构成的多元主体在整个规划过程中的协作,保证规划的集体决策;(2)政府赋权协作组织形成协商平台,协调规划“自上而下”与“自下而上”流程;(3)采用“洋葱圈原则”,细化城市公众协作主体并解决各阶段核心议题;(4)在规划全过程拓宽公众参与途径,保障集体信息沟通,形成空间共治。最后本文在总结维也纳都市花园协作规划实施机制的基础上,尝试为我国城市绿地空间的协作式规划提供积极建议与参考。


Abstract:

Collaborative planning can effectively coordinate the interest conflicts among multiple stakeholders in urban green space. The collaborative planning of urban garden in Vienna of Austria is one of the examples and has made remarkable achievements through nearly 40 years’ development. This paper takes it as the case study and explores the whole planning process including planning preparation, implementation and feedback stages in the way of actual investigation and interview. It finds the features of collaborative planning, including multiple stakeholders’ participation, flexible space use and diversified value realization. Then it analyzes the implementation mechanism of this collaborative planning. Firstly, through the cooperation of government, government organizations, professional teams and urban public, the collective decision-making of planning is ensured. Secondly, the government empowers the cooperative organizations to form a negotiation platform to coordinate the “top-down” and “bottom-up” processes of planning. Thirdly, the“onion ring principle” is adopted to refine the cooperation members of urban public and to solve the core issues. Fourthly, the methods of public participation are broadened to ensure the collective information shared during the whole process. This paper summarizes the implementation mechanism of Vienna collaborative planning on urban gardening in the end, providing suggestions and references for Chinese urban green space planning in a collaborative way.


版权信息:
基金项目:
作者简介:

李帅,同济大学建筑与城市规划学院,博士研究生。2110292@tongji.edu.cn

彭震伟(通信作者),同济大学党委副书记,同济大学建筑与城市规划学院,教授,博士生导师。pengzhw@tongji.edu.cn


译者简介:

参考文献:
  • [1] ANDREAS E, ISABELLE S. Creative natures. community gardening, social class and city development in Vienna[J]. Geoforum, 2018, 92: 181-195.

    [2] KUMNIG S. Between green image production, participatory politics and growth: urban agriculture and gardens in the context of neoliberal urban development in Vienna[J]. ACME: an international journal for critical

    geographies, 2017, 16 (2): 232-248.

    [3] RITA M. Co-creating community gardens on untapped terrain–lessons from a transdisciplinary planning and participation process in the context of municipal housing in Vienna[J]. Local environment, 2018, 23(12): 1207-1224.

    [4] LEFEBVRE H. The production of space[M]. Oxford UK: Blackwell Ltd, 1991.

    [5] 孟超. 微观城市实践: 一种空间抵抗策略[J]. 求是学刊, 2015(3): 44-51.

    [6] 艾伦·莱瑟姆, 德里克·麦考马克, 金·麦克纳马拉, 等. 城市地理学核心概念[M]. 邵文实, 译. 南京: 江苏教育出版社, 2013.

    [7] SHANNON M A. Moving from the limits and problems of rational planning toward a collaborative and participatory planning approach[C] // EFI Proceedings 30: Formulation and implementation of national forest programmes. Finland: European Forest Institute, 1999: 139-151.

    [8] ALLMENDINGER P. Planning theory[M]. Houndmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

    [9] 王丰龙, 陈倩敏, 许艳艳, 等. 沟通式规划理论的简介,批判与借鉴[J]. 国际城市规划, 2012(6): 82-90.

    [10] HEALEY P. Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory[J]. Town planning review, 1992, 63(2): 143-163.

    [11] FORESTER J. Planning in the face of conflict: negotiation and mediation strategies in local land use regulation[J]. JAPA, 1987, 53: 303-314.

    [12] SAGER T. Responsibilities of theorists: the case of communicative planning theory[J]. Progress in planning, 2009, 72(1): 1-51.

    [13] SAGER T. The logic of critical communicative planning: transaction cost alteration[J]. Planning theory, 2006, 5(3): 223-254.

    [14] McCANN E J. Collaborative visioning of urban planning as therapy? the politics of public-private policy making[J]. Professional geographer, 2001(2): 207- 218.

    [15] 胥明明. 沟通式规划研究综述及其在中国的适应性思考[J]. 国际城市规划, 2017, 32(3): 100-105. DOI: 10.22217/upi.2016.033.

    [16] FRIEDMANN J. Planning in the public domain[M]. NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987.

    [17] HARRIS N. Collaborative planning: from theoretical foundations to practice forms[M] // ALLMENDINGER P, TEWDWR-JONES M, eds. Planning futures: new directions in planning theory. London: Taylor & Francis, 2002:

    21-43.

    [18] INNES J E. Planning through consensus building: a new view of the comprehensive planning ideal[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1996, 62(4): 460-472.

    [19] 戴维·哈维. 叛逆的城市:从城市权利到城市革命[M]. 叶齐茂, 倪晓晖, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2014.

    [20] ANDRES L. Differential spaces, power hierarchy and collaborative planning: a critique of the role of temporary uses in shaping and making places[J]. Urban studies, 2013, 50(4): 759-775.

    [21] ALTéS A, SERRA M. Latent spaces in the city: hybrid practices in the urban realm[M] // BABALIS D, ed. Chronocity: sensitive interventions in historic environment. Firenze, Italy: Alinea editrice, s.r.l., 2012: 24-26.

    [22] DRESCHER A W, HOLMER R J, LAQUINTA D L. Urban homegardens and allotment gardens for sustainable livelihoods: Management strategies and institutional environments[M] // KUMAR B M, NAIR P K R, eds. Tropical Homegardens. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006: 317-338.

    [23] POTHUKUCHI K, KAUFMAN J L. Placing the food system on the urban agenda: the role of municipal institutions in food systems planning[J]. Agriculture and human values, 1999, 16: 213-224.

    [24] FUHRICH M, GODERBAUER, E. Urban restructuring: making ‘more’ from ‘less’[M] // MüLLER B, ed. Urban regional resilience: how do cities and regions deal with change, 2011: 49-58.

    [25] SOFIA N, TANJA K, SIMONE T. et al. Urban gardening and green space governance: towards new collaborative planning practices[J]. Urban planning, 2006, 1(1): 5-19.

    [26] Wiener Landesgesstz. Bauordnung für Wien StF.: LGBI.NO.11/1930[Z]. Wien.Magistrat der Stadt Wien, 2018.

    [27] Architektur und Stadtgestaltung (Magistratsabteilung 19). Wiener Kleingartengesetz LGBI 35/2013[Z]. Wien. Magistrat der Stadt Wien, 2013.

    [28] Wiener Stadtg?rten Abteilung (Magistratsabteilung 42). Wiener Parkleitbild[Z]. Wien.Magistrat der Stadt Wien, 2011.

    [29] Forst und Landwirtschaftsbetrieb Abteilung (Magistratsabteilung 49). Garteln in Wien[Z]. Wien.Magistrat der Stadt Wien, 2018.

    [30] Wiener Stadtg?rten Abteilung (Magistratsabteilung 42). StraSSengrn-Leitbild[Z]. Wien.Magistrat der Stadt Wien, 2011.

    [31] Stadtentwicklung und Stadtplanung (Magistratsabteilung 18). Step2025: grüne und offene Raumplanung[Z]. Wien.Stadtenwicklung Wien, 2014.

    [32] Stadtentwicklung und Stadtplanung (Magistratsabteilung 18). Praxisbuch Partizipation[Z]. Wien.Magistrat der Stadt Wien, 2012.


《国际城市规划》编辑部    北京市车公庄西路10号东楼E305/320    100037
邮箱:upi@vip.163.com  电话:010-58323806  传真:010-58323825
京ICP备13011701号-6  京公网安备11010802014223

7767835