点击排行
 
正文
全文下载次数:94
2023年第1期   DOI:10.19830/j.upi.2020.321
城市居民智慧流动性研究进展及展望
Review and Prospects of Urban Residents’ Smart Mobility

李智轩 甄峰 张姗琪

Li Zhixuan,Zhen Feng,Zhang Shanqi

关键词:智慧流动性;流动空间;城市居民;信息通信技术;智慧城市

Keywords:Smart Mobility; Space of Flows; Urban Residents; Information and Communication Technology; Smart City

摘要:

持续的流动已经成为信息时代最显著的特征,流动所带来的环境恶化、疾病传播等负面问题使得人们对流动空间治理愈发关注,而信息通信技术影响下的智慧流动性为解决这些问题提供了新思路。在“流动转向”背景下,流动性已经成为包括地理学在内许多学科研究的新范式。信息通信技术改变了城市居民的流动行为、流动体验以及流动表征的社会意义,建构了跨越多重空间的高维流动空间网络。本文从智慧流动性的内涵与特征、智慧流动性的影响因素与机理,以及智慧流动服务与管理三个方面对已有研究进行梳理;并以流动空间理论为基础构建城市居民智慧流动性研究框架,试图为智慧流动性研究提供新视角。从实践需求来看,研究智慧流动性为智慧城市建设和智慧流动管理提供了重要参考。


Abstract:

Consistent flow has become the most prominent feature of the information age.The environmental degradation, disease spread and other problems caused by flow have  made people pay more attention to the governance of space of flows. Under the influence of information and communication technology, smart mobility provides new opportunities for solving these problems. In the context of “mobility turn”, mobility has become a new paradigm for many subjects including geography. Information and communication technology has changed the urban residents’ mobility behavior, mobility experience and social significance of mobility representation, and has constructed a high-dimensional mobile space network that spans multiple spaces. This paper summarizes the existing research from three aspects: the connotation and characteristics of smart mobility, the influencing factors and mechanism of smart mobility, and the service and management of smart mobility. Based on the theory of space of flows, we build a research framework of studying urban residents’ smart mobility, and attempt to provide a new perspective for the related research. From the perspective of practical needs, research on smart mobility provides an important reference for smart city construction and smart mobility management.


版权信息:
基金项目:国家社会科学重点基金(20AZD040),中国博士后科学基金(2019M651784),中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金
作者简介:

李智轩,南京大学建筑与城市规划学院,硕士研究生。771445516@qq.com

甄峰,南京大学建筑与城市规划学院,教授。zhenfeng@nju.edu.cn

张姗琪,南京大学建筑与城市规划学院,博士后。zhangshanqi@nju.edu.cn


译者简介:

参考文献:
  • [1] URRY J. Sociology beyond societies: mobilities for the Twenty-first Century[M]. London: Routledge, 2000.

    [2] CRESSWELL T. Mobilities i: catching up[J]. Progress in human geography, 2011, 35(4): 550-558.

    [3] 蔡晓梅, 卜美玲, 李军. 以流动看世界——基于彼得·阿迪《流动性》的研究述评[J]. 热带地理, 2020, 40(3): 455-465.

    [4] SHELLER M, URRY J. The new mobilities paradigm[J]. Environment and planning a, 2006, 38(2): 207-226.

    [5] PEPRAH C, AMPONSAH O, ODURO C. A system view of smart mobility and its implications for Ghanaian cities[J]. Sustainable cities and society, 2019, 44: 739-747.

    [6] DIMITRAKOPOULOS G, UDEN L, VARLAMIS I. Chapter 18-intelligent transport systems and smart mobility[M] // DIMITRAKOPOULOS G, UDEN L, VARLAMIS I. The future of intelligent transport systems. Elsevier, 2020.

    [7] BIESER J C T, HILTY L M. Conceptualizing the impact of information and communication technology on individual time and energy use[J]. Telematics and informatics, 2020, https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101375.

    [8] AGUILéRA A, GUILLOT C, RALLET A. Mobile ICTs and physical mobility: review and research agenda[J]. Transportation research part a: policy and practice, 2012, 46(4): 664-672.

    [9] NICOLA? I, LE BOENNEC R. Smart mobility providing smart cities[M] // DA COSTA P, ATTIAS D. Towards a sustainable economy. sustainability and innovation. France: Springer, 2018: 103-122.

    [10] SALOMON I. Telecommunications and travel relationships: a review[J]. Transportation research part a: general, 1986, 20(3): 223-238.

    [11] MOKHTARIAN P L. A typology of relationships between telecommunications and transportation[J]. Transportation research part a: general, 1990, 24(3): 231-242.

    [12] LYONS G. The reshaping of activities and mobility through new technologies[J]. Journal of transport geography, 2009, 17(2): 81-82.

    [13] LYONS G. Viewpoint: transport’s digital age transition[J]. Journal of transport and land use, 2014, 8(2): 1-19.

    [14] NOBIS C, LENZ B. Communication and mobility behaviour–a trend and panel analysis of the correlation between mobile phone use and mobility[J]. Journal of transport geography, 2009, 17(2): 93-103.

    [15] XI G, ZHEN F, CAO X, et al. The interaction between e-shopping and store shopping: empirical evidence from Nanjing, China[J]. Transportation letters, 2020, 12(3): 157-165.

    [16] KENYON S. The impacts of internet use upon activity participation and travel: results from a longitudinal diary-based panel study[J]. Transportation research part c: emerging technologies, 2010, 18(1): 21-35.

    [17] MOKHTARIAN P. Telecommunications and travel: the case for complementarity[J]. Journal of industrial ecology, 2002, 6(2): 43-57.

    [18] KONRAD K, WITTOWSKY D. Virtual mobility and travel behavior of young people–connections of two dimensions of mobility[J]. Research in transportation economics, 2018, 68: 11-17.

    [19] CLAYTON W, JAIN J, PARKHURST G. An ideal journey: making bus travel desirable[J]. Mobilities, 2016, 12(5): 706-725.

    [20] HONG J, MCARTHUR D P, LIVINGSTON M. Can accessing the internet while travelling encourage commuters to use public transport regardless of their attitude?[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(12): 1-10.

    [21] FARAG S, LYONS G. To use or not to use? an empirical study of pre-trip public transport information for business and leisure trips and comparison with car travel[J]. Transport policy, 2012, 20: 82-92.

    [22] MOKHTARIAN P, TAL G. Impacts of ICT on travel behavior: a tapestry of relationships[M] // JEAN-PAUL R, THBO N, JON S. The Sage handbook of transport studies. Davis, CA, USA: Sage Publishing, 2013: 241-260.

    [23] COUCLELIS H. From sustainable transportation to sustainable accessibility: can we avoid a new tragedy of the commons?[M] // JANELLE D G, HODGE D C. Information, place, and cyberspace. Berlin: Springer, 2000: 341-356.

    [24] LENZ B, NOBIS C. The changing allocation of activities in space and time by the use of ICT–“fragmentation” as a new concept and empirical results[J]. Transportation research part a: policy and practice, 2007, 41(2): 190-204.

    [25] SCHWANEN T, KWAN M-P. The internet, mobile phone and space-time constraints[J]. Geoforum, 2008, 39(3): 1362-1377.

    [26] LYONS G, URRY J . Travel t ime use in the information age[J]. Transportation research part a: policy and practice, 2005, 39(2-3): 257-276.

    [27] WARDMAN M, LYONS G. The digital revolution and worthwhile use of travel time: implications for appraisal and forecasting[J]. Transportation, 2016, 43(3): 507-530.

    [28] JAIN J, LYONS G. The gift of travel time[J]. Journal of transport geography, 2008, 16(2): 81-89.

    [29] GRIPSRUD M, HJORTHOL R. Working on the train: from ‘dead time’ to productive and vital time[J]. Transportation, 2012, 39(5): 941-956.

    [30] TANG J, ZHEN F, CAO J, et al. How do passengers use travel time? a case study of Shanghai-Nanjing high speed rail[J]. Transportation, 2017, 45(2): 451-477.

    [31] 王波, 卢佩莹, 甄峰. 智慧社会下的城市地理学研究——基于居民活动的视角[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(10): 2075-2086.

    [32] ANDREEV P, SALOMON I, PLISKIN N. Review: state of teleactivities[J]. Transportation research part c: emerging technologies, 2010, 18(1): 3-20.

    [33] BEN-ELIA E, AVINERI E. Response to travel information: a behavioural review[J]. Transport reviews, 2015, 35(3): 352-377.

    [34] DE MORAES RAMOS G, MAI T, DAAMEN W, et al. Route choice behaviour and travel information in a congested network: static and dynamic recursive models[J]. Transportation research part c: emerging technologies, 2020, 114: 681-693.

    [35] KHAN N A, HABIB M A, JAMAL S. Effects of smartphone application usage on mobility choices[J]. Transportation research part a: policy and practice, 2020, 132: 932-947.

    [36] 孙九霞, 周尚意, 王宁, 等. 跨学科聚焦的新领域: 流动的时间、空间与社会[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(10): 1801-1818.

    [37] HAN S Y, TSOU M-H, CLARKE K C. Revisiting the death of geography in the era of big data: the friction of distance in cyberspace and real space[J]. International journal of digital earth, 2017, 11(5): 451-469.

    [38] KNIES G. Neighbourhood social ties: how much do residential, physical and virtual mobility matter?[J]. The British journal of sociology, 2013, 64(3): 425-452.

    [39] LANIADO D, VOLKOVICH Y, SCELLATO S, et al. The impact of geographic distance on online social interactions[J]. Information systems frontiers, 2017, 20(6): 1203-1218.

    [40] BROWN A. Redefining car access: ride-hail travel and use in Los Angeles[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2019, 85(2): 83-95.

    [41] CLARK J, CURL A. Bicycle and car share schemes as inclusive modes of travel? a socio-spatial analysis in Glasgow, UK[J]. Social inclusion, 2016, 4(3): 83-99.

    [42] KENYON S, LYONS G, RAFFERTY J. Transport and social exclusion: investigating the possibility of promoting inclusion through virtual mobility[J]. Journal of transport geography, 2002, 10(3): 207-219.

    [43] KENYON S, RAFFERTY J, LYONS G. Social exclusion and transport in the UK: a role for virtual accessibility in the alleviation of mobility-related social exclusion?[J]. Journal of social policy, 2003, 32(3): 317-338.

    [44] URETA S. Mobilising poverty?: mobile phone use and everyday spatial mobility among low-income families in Santiago, Chile[J]. The Information Society, 2008, 24(2): 83-92.

    [45] GROTH S. Multimodal divide: reproduction of transport poverty in smart mobility trends[J]. Transportation research part a: policy and practice, 2019, 125: 56-71.

    [46] TAN K S Y, CHAN C M L. Unequal access: applying Bourdieu’s practice theory to illuminate the challenges of ICT use among senior citizens in Singapore[J]. Journal of aging studies, 2018, 47: 123-131.

    [47] ALEMI F, CIRCELLA G, HANDY S, et al. What influences travelers to use Uber? exploring the factors affecting the adoption of on-demand ride services in California[J]. Travel behaviour and society, 2018, 13: 88-104.

    [48] PRIYA UTENG T, JULSRUD T E, GEORGE C. The role of life events and context in type of car share uptake: comparing users of peer-to-peer and cooperative programs in Oslo, Norway[J]. Transportation research part d: transport and environment, 2019, 71: 186-206.

    [49] AXSEN J, KENNETH S K. Interpersonal influence within car buyers’social networks: applying five perspectives to plug-in hybrid vehicle drivers[J]. Environment and planning a, 2012, 44(5): 1047-1065.

    [50] AXSEN J, SOVACOOL B K. The roles of users in electric, shared and automated mobility transitions[J]. Transportation research part d: transport and environment, 2019, 71: 1-21.

    [51] LUCAS K. Transport and social exclusion: where are we now?[J]. Transport policy, 2012, 20: 105-113.

    [52] LUCAS K, MATTIOLI G, VERLINGHIERI E, et al. Transport poverty and its adverse social consequences[J]. Transport, 2016, 169(TR6): 353-365.

    [53] GOLUB A, SATTERFIELD V, SERRITELLA M, et al. Assessing the barriers to equity in smart mobility systems: a case study of Portland, Oregon[J]. Case studies on transport policy, 2019, 7(4): 689-697.

    [54] VELAGA N R, BEECROFT M, NELSON J D, et al. Transport poverty meets the digital divide: accessibility and connectivity in rural communities[J]. Journal of transport geography, 2012, 21: 102-112.

    [55] COHEN-BLANKSHTAIN G, ROTEM-MINDALI O. Key research themes on ICT and sustainable urban mobility[J]. International journal of sustainable transportation, 2016, 10(1): 9-17.

    [56] GOULD J, GOLOB T F. Shopping without travel or travel without shopping? an investigation of electronic home shopping[J]. Transport reviews, 1997, 17(4): 355-376.

    [57] URRY J. Mobility and proximity[J]. Sociology, 2002, 36(2): 255-274.

    [58] URRY J. Social networks, travel and talk[J]. British journal of sociology, 2003, 54(2): 155-175.

    [59] LARSEN J, URRY J, AXHAUSEN K W. Networks and tourism[J]. Annals of tourism research, 2007, 34(1): 244-262.

    [60] KLEIN I, BEN-ELIA E. Emergence of cooperation in congested road networks using ICT and future and emerging technologies: a game-based review[J]. Transportation research part c: emerging technologies, 2016, 72: 10-28.

    [61] VAN ESSEN M, THOMAS T, CHORUS C, et al. The effect of travel time information on day-to-day route choice behaviour: evidence from a realworld experiment[J]. Transportmetrica b: transport dynamics, 2019, 7(1): 1719-1742.

    [62] AMBROSINO G, NELSON J D, BOERO M, et al. Enabling intermodal urban transport through complementary services: from flexible mobility services to the shared use mobility agency[J]. Research in transportation economics, 2016, 59: 179-184.

    [63] RAYLE L, DAI D, CHAN N, et al. Just a better taxi? a survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco[J]. Transport policy, 2016, 45: 168-178.

    [64] 晏龙旭, 任熙元, 王德, 等. 范式转换: 共享机动性及规划和治理响应[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2019(4): 63-69.

    [65] CLEWLOW R R, MISHRA G S. Disruptive transportation: the adoption, utilization, and impacts of ride-hailing in the United States[R]. Davis, California: Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis University of California, 2017.

    [66] TIRACHINI A, GOMEZ-LOBO A. Does ride-hailing increase or decrease vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT)? a simulation approach for Santiago de Chile[J]. International journal of sustainable transportation, 2017, 14(3): 187-204.

    [67] JITTRAPIROM P, CAIATI V, FENERI A-M, et al. Mobility as a service: a critical review of definitions, assessments of schemes, and key challenges[J]. Urban planning, 2017, 2(2): 13-25.

    [68] LYONS G, HAMMOND P, MACKAY K. The importance of user perspective in the evolution of MaaS[J]. Transportation research part a: policy and practice, 2019, 121: 22-36.

    [69] WONG Y Z, HENSHER D A, MULLEY C. Mobility as a Service (MaaS): charting a future context[J]. Transportation research part a: policy and practice, 2020, 131: 5-19.

    [70] 甄峰. 信息时代新空间形态研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2004, 23(3): 16-26.

    [71] CASTELLS M. The rise of the network society[M]. Cambridge. MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.

    [72] 秦萧, 甄峰. 大数据与小数据结合: 信息时代城市研究方法探讨[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(3): 321-330.

    [73] CRESSWELL T. Towards a politics of mobility[J]. Environment and planning d: society and space, 2010, 28(1): 17-31.

    [74] 陆锋, 刘康, 陈洁. 大数据时代的人类移动性研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2014, 16(5): 665-672.


《国际城市规划》编辑部    北京市车公庄西路10号东楼E305/320    100037
邮箱:upi@vip.163.com  电话:010-58323806  传真:010-58323825
京ICP备13011701号-6  京公网安备11010802014223

7777923